Search for: "Housing Authority v. City Council" Results 101 - 120 of 996
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2008, 8:20 pm
The House of Lords had in effect approved McLellan in Kay v Lambeth London Borough Council [2006] 2 AC 465. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:08 am
R (Best) v Oxford City Council [2009] EWHC 608 (Admin), [2009] All ER (D) 252, noted on this week’s Garden Court Housing Law Bulletin, but not yet on BAILII. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:56 am by sally
Supreme Court Gisda Cyf v Barratt [2010] UKSC 41 (13 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Shah v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2326 (13 October 2010) Dorset County Council v House (Rev 1) [2010] EWCA Crim 2270 (13 October 2010) O & H, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2233 (13 October 2010) King v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWCA Crim 2522 (13 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Broomleigh Housing Association… [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 11:38 am by Giles Peaker
Lambeth’s argument that the requirements for reasoning set out in Nzolameso v Westminster City Council [(2015) UKSC 22, (2015) PTSR 549 didn’t apply because that was about s.193 accommodation and s.202 review decisions was not accepted. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 1:27 pm by Giles Peaker
Flat 7 Bravington Road in London (which was in the area of Westminster City Council). [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 10:39 am
Swindon BC v Redpath [2009] EWCA Civ 943 By s.153A(1) Housing Act 1996, a variety of social landlords, including local housing authorities, may apply for an injunction to restrain a person from engaging in “housing-related” anti-social behaviour. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:21 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Since the City Council had earlier made the determination that such takings were not in the public interest when it repealed the ordinance authorizing them, the court held that the City did not impair its obligations. [read post]
10 May 2016, 3:06 pm by Giles Peaker
Crosby v Birmingham City Council, Birmingham Civil Justice Centre, 8 March 2016 Ms C was an Introductory tenant of Birmingham. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 3:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
Ill. 1994) (holding that the Fourth Amendment barred warrantless sweeps through public housing projects); Resident Action Council v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 12:53 pm by Giles Peaker
The Court of Appeal reviewed the main authorities R v Hillingdon London Borough Council ex p Puhlhofer (1986) AC 484 (‘Puhlhofer‘), which concerned the interpretation of sections 1 and 4 of the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act 1977 (‘the 1977 Act’), R v Brent London Borough Council ex p Awua (1996) AC 55 (‘Awua‘), which concerned Part III of the 1985 Act, and Birmingham City Council v… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
Makisi & Ors v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 355 Does the right to make oral submissions to a review officer on a s.202 Housing Act 1996 review, following a 'minded to' letter, mean that the applicant has the right to insist on a meeting? [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
Makisi & Ors v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 355 Does the right to make oral submissions to a review officer on a s.202 Housing Act 1996 review, following a 'minded to' letter, mean that the applicant has the right to insist on a meeting? [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:57 pm by SJM
With remarkable speed, the Supreme Court has handed down its judgement in Nzolameso v Westminster City Council , having announced immediately after the hearing on 17/3/2015 that the appeal would be allowed, with reasons to follow. [read post]
5 May 2015, 10:11 pm by Patricia Salkin
In 2006, the Hackensack City Council authorized the City’s Planning Board to undertake a preliminary investigation to determine whether a two-block area in Hackensack’s central business district, a mix of commercial and residential uses, should be designated as an area in need of redevelopment. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 11:28 am by Giles Peaker
R(N) v Westminster City Council [2015] EWHC 799 (Admin) (26 February 2015) [Not on Bailii, we’ve seen a transcript.] [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm by Andrew Sather
In this case upheld the authority of Congress to create the Bank of the United States.Cohens v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 3:55 am
Newport City Council v Charles [2008] EWCA Civ 1541, The Times, 11 Aug 2008 The transcript for this (factually remarkable but legally straightforward) case has only just been produced, hence the delay in covering it. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 3:55 am
Newport City Council v Charles [2008] EWCA Civ 1541, The Times, 11 Aug 2008 The transcript for this (factually remarkable but legally straightforward) case has only just been produced, hence the delay in covering it. [read post]