Search for: "Housing Authority v. City of Los Angeles" Results 101 - 120 of 274
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am by Arthur F. Coon
City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455; South Orange County Wastewater Authority v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Los Angeles (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 259, which focuses on whether an agency has discretion to require project changes that would mitigate environmental consequences an EIR might reveal. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 11:38 am by Shiloh Carter
Epstein Public Interest Law Program and the Critical Race Studies Program at the University of California Los Angeles School of Law. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:55 pm by Rory Little
The Mendezes (now married) pursued three distinct Fourth Amendment claims in their federal lawsuit against the deputies and Los Angeles County: the failure to get a search warrant, the failure to knock and announce, and excessive force. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
In one case that I found astonishing as a law student, City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
  As the City’s ordinance did not give the City authority to mitigate environmental impacts not otherwise associated with design features, the appellate court ruled that the exemption was appropriate, following the logic in Bowman v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am by Adam Chandler
Times reports on another case in which review was denied on Monday, in which a 70-year-old Los Angeles attorney challenged his indefinite solitary confinement for contempt of court. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:45 am by Joe May
From the States and Municipalities: California – Ethics Panel Wants More Public Funding Available to Candidates Los Angeles Times – Soumya Karlamangla | Published: 4/17/2014 The Los Angeles Ethics Commission recommended the city’s public campaign finance program increase the matching funds available to candidates. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
For example, the cities of Aspen and Boulder and the city and County of Denver each had enacted ordinances which banned discrimination in many transactions and activities, including housing, employment, education, public accommodations, and health and welfare services. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co… [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:21 am by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Berkeley (2012) 203 Cal.App.4th 656: A larger than average house, to be constructed on a Berkeley hillside, met the test for “unusual circumstances”, limiting the use of a CEQA categorical exemption. [read post]
The updated Guidelines will also help streamline the development process for housing projects in low-VMT and transit-oriented locations, thereby helping increase the supply of housing options in areas with low transportation costs. [read post]