Search for: "Howe v. Bishop" Results 101 - 120 of 542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
So how can there be any question of whether a Diocese can "succeed" itself? [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 10:24 am
So how can there be any question of whether a Diocese can "succeed" itself? [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:02 pm
When and how was the term “unqualified accession” added to Article V of the Episcopal Church Constitution, and what is the legal basis and evidence for concluding that the amendment applied to any diocese other than a “new Diocese” admitted after the effective date of that amendment to Article V [in 1982]? [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Catholic Bishop of Chicago ... which held that Congress did not intend to bring teachers at church-operated schools within the  jurisdiction of the Act. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff’s equivocal denial of knowledge of the terms of the settlement is flatly contradicted by the clear terms of the settlement agreement (see Bishop v Maurer, 33 AD3d 497, 499 [1st Dept 2006], affd 9 NY3d 910 [2007]). [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 9:30 am
The last thing Bishop Lawrence's diocese wanted was to be seen as continuing as a member diocese of the apostate ECUSA. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 7:09 am
(How they succeeded in pulling off that strategy will be the subject of my following post.)For ECUSA and its attorneys, the world of church property law began and ended with Watson v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 2:28 pm
Thus just as they flouted Resolution 1.10 from the 1998 Lambeth Conference in 2003, when they approved the consecration of Bishop V. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:04 pm
The last thing Bishop Lawrence's diocese wanted was to be seen as continuing as a member diocese of the apostate ECUSA. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 1:41 pm
They left in 2013, after that parish voted to remain with Bishop Lawrence's Episcopal Diocese. [read post]