Search for: "Howes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections"
Results 101 - 120
of 526
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
CV 061436)The treatment and management of condemned inmates from the time an executiondate is set through completion of the execution is subject to a protocol issued on May 15,2007, by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) andCDCR Secretary James E. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
BOTELHO, Petitioners v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 4:17 pm
The Court could not make an award of “vindicatory” damages, merely to mark the commission of the wrong; this was wrong in principle: see R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] 1 AC 245 [97-100]. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 12:51 pm
Quazzo v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
However, caselaw confirms that welfare is still ‘a primary consideration’ (ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 2 AC 166, [2011] UKSC 4), so it’s going to be a pretty important factor in any consideration of publication, and in many cases it will be determinative. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
The Act created the Occupational Safety and Health Administra- tion (OSHA), which is part of the Department of Labor and under the supervision of its Secretary. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
In Simien v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 6:53 am
In another letter, Jefferson urged Hay to "denounce [Marbury v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 1:47 pm
This article is part of a symposium previewing Trump v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:24 pm
See, e.g., NFIB v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 7:27 pm
Kammen cites Cuyler v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am
Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal reports that the Department will institute new procedures that will correct the error (subscription required). [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
At paragraph 49 of his judgment, the learned judge cited Lord Bingham’s much repeated observations as to the purposes of an “Article 2 investigation” in the leading case of R (Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Department.[7] These purposes include bringing the facts to light, exposing discreditable conduct or dangerous practices, and providing some degree of comfort to the deceased’s relative by ensuring that lessons are learnt from… [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
The Hawaii v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:09 am
The documents are the subject of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit (McKinley v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 1:00 am
R (B) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14-15 Nov 2017. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
That happens to be the correct legal result. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:55 pm
That fact “dramatically affects how the scales tip in this case,” the appeals court found. [read post]
