Search for: "Hubbard v. Law"
Results 101 - 120
of 247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court's ruling, opining although "Public Officers Law §17(3)(a) provides that the State shall indemnify its employees for a judgment or settlement provided that the act or omission which was the subject of the judgment or settlement occurred while the employee was acting within the scope of his [or her] public employment or duties," that duty does not extend to cases in which "the injury or damage resulted from intentional… [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court's ruling, opining although "Public Officers Law §17(3)(a) provides that the State shall indemnify its employees for a judgment or settlement provided that the act or omission which was the subject of the judgment or settlement occurred while the employee was acting within the scope of his [or her] public employment or duties," that duty does not extend to cases in which "the injury or damage resulted from intentional… [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 4:00 pm
Hubbard, 2010 U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 10:24 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 10:24 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 4:30 am
” Jared Hubbard provides an account of the argument at Letters Blogatory. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 1:46 am
Hubbard, Deputy Attorney General; Martin L. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al | Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financing.Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel… [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 10:11 pm
The cases which seem to me to offer the best guidance are Hubbard v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 5:20 am
” Cobb v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
After last year’s guidelines on black and white marks, reported by the IPKat here, it is now the turn of trade marks sharing elements with little or no distinctiveness.* Pom Wonderful the tenacious -- in pursuit of trade mark rightsNeil's first post of this year is about Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al, a decision rendered a few days ago by the 9th U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 12:33 am
José Carlos Fernandez Rozas (Complutense Madrid, Spain) and John Fellas (Hughes Hubbard & Reed, New York, USA). [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 2:54 am
Wal-Mart v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:24 am
See Reed v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 4:04 pm
They do not overrule a decision. ] In Moore v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 11:07 am
We find that the application of an inherent prejudice standard to this case is clearly not warranted under existing case law. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 1:44 am
The Court noted that Hubbard v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 1:44 am
The Court noted that Hubbard v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 2:00 pm
Hubbard. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:57 am
In R. v. [read post]
