Search for: "Hyde v. Hyde" Results 101 - 120 of 733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2009, 12:38 pm by Robert Hougham
This is the recent case of Elton John’s spoof diaries written by Marina Hyde. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 11:26 am by admin
In early August, the former judges and prosecutors signed onto an amicus brief that urges the Supreme Court to grant certiorari in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 8:01 pm by Jordan Bublick
Last week, the United States Supreme Court granted the writ of certiori in the case of Bullard v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
Ziegler investigates the journey from Roe v Wade, the constitutional right to abortion; through to the Hyde Amendment, a United States federal ban on abortion coverage for federally funded healthcare recipients, including women enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid; and the introduction of the undue burden standard from the Planned Parenthood v Casey (1992) United States Supreme Court decision. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:00 pm by Ben Cheng
The petition of the day is: Shaygan v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 12:37 pm by Tom Smith
The problem is, nominally pro-life Catholic legislators may take the jumping nuns (if I may term them that) as doctrinal and legal authority that the Senate bill presents no danger of reversing the Hyde amendment policy. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 6:44 pm
Hyde, [1943] 2 W.W.R. 344 (B.C.C.A.); and Re Lotzkar Estate (1965), 51 W.W.R. 99 (B.C.C.A.). [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 9:12 am by Steve Statsinger
September 30, 2009), the court affirmed the denial of the defendants' attorneys fees under the Hyde Amendment. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:33 pm by binder'sblog
He consistently supported the Hyde Amendment which is a ban on using federal funds for abortions. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
At 11 a.m., the Court will hear argument in Eisenstein v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:20 pm by Big Tent Democrat
This proposed law clearly violates the undue burden standard established in Casey v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm
The requirement of nonhearsay allegations has been described as a "much more demanding standard" than a showing of reasonable cause alone (Alejandro, 70 NY2d at 138, quoting1966 Report of Temp Commn on Revision of Penal Law and Crim Code, Staff Comments); however, it is nevertheless a much lower threshold than the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt (People v Henderson, 92 NY2d 677, 680 [1999]; People v Hyde, 302 AD2d 101 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]