Search for: "I.S. V. STATE" Results 101 - 120 of 17,477
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2013, 2:47 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Second, the United States Supreme Court has "insisted that the discretion of the official in the field be circumscribed as held in Delaware v Prouse. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 5:25 pm
[The second opponent] submitted in its statement of grounds of appeal with respect to A 54 and the disclosure of comparative example 4 of D1 that the data of D6, i.e. the experimental data of [the first opponent] were more reliable than D11, i.e. the theoretical calculation provided by [the second opponent] and stated that it withdrew D11. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 1:10 am
Therefore, the trial court erred in allowing the State to ask petitioner "were-they-lying" questions. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 7:20 am by Bridget Crawford
The Supreme Court of the United States will take up this question this term in the context of North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:09 pm by Elizabeth B. Carpenter
Kentucky 476 U.S. 79 (1986) Facts: When selecting a jury, both parties may remove potential jurors using an unlimited number of challenges for cause (e.g., stated reasons such as bias) and a limited number of peremptory challenges (i.e., do not need to state a reason). [read post]