Search for: "IMS Health Inc. V. Sorrell"
Results 101 - 120
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2017, 11:25 am
IMS Health Inc. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 8:13 am
Nicopure Labs, LLC v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:57 pm
IMS Health Inc., 131 S. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 9:48 am
IMS Health Inc., 564 U.S. ___, 131 S. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 10:45 am
First DataBank, Inc., 115 Cal. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:08 pm
IMS Health Inc.. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 8:22 pm
IMS Health Inc., 2011 WL 2472796 (U.S. 2011). [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 8:22 pm
IMS Health Inc., 2011 WL 2472796 (U.S. 2011). [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:47 pm
IMS Health Inc. may carry more weight. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court has opined (see, e.g., Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:57 am
IMS Health, Inc., 131 S. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am
IMS Health Inc., 131 S. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
IMS Health, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 3:03 pm
IMS Health Inc. (2011). [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
Let’s roll the tape. #1: PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
This state "police power" to regulate "health, safety, and morals" is implicitly acknowledged by the Constitution's structure of enumerated powers, and by the Tenth Amendment.[1] The Constitution's preservation of the police power in the states ensures that "the facets of governing that touch on citizens' daily lives are normally administered by smaller governments closer to the governed. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:44 am
IMS Health Inc., 131 S. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:50 am
IMS Health Inc. (2011), another content discrimination case, which dealt with restrictions on the distribution of information about doctors’ prescription practices). [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:01 pm
IMS Health, Inc. and several decisions reducing the rights of organized labor, including Janus v. [read post]