Search for: "IN RE: AMENDMENT TO THE RULES GOVERNING DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS"
Results 101 - 120
of 136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
If a lawyer betrayed her client’s confidence, she could be subject to disciplinary proceedings or an action in negligence. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
Harassment based on race or disability, for example, would continue to be governed by the current, more inclusive standard for creating a hostile educational environment. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 2:16 pm
, In re: Tara A. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
Entry restrictions As noted in Part II, one potential abuse of self-governing powers is the imposition of unnecessary entry restrictions. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
This subjects them to disciplinary proceedings and fines—for each illegal contract they had a client sign! [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
The King Law Reporter will be available on Fastcase.com for free through February 2018. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm
Notably, the sanction authorities implemented under the Final Rule were much broader than those provided under the Common Rule (previously adopted by OPM in 1993). [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 10:39 am
.: The Free Speech Project at Georgetown University and the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University will host “Secrets and Leaks: Whistleblowers, Journalists, and National Security. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
In addition, following publication by the UK Government in 2023 of a draft statutory instrumentsetting out a legislative framework for a new UK prospectus regime, the FCA has announced that it will consult on rules for when prospectuses will be required in summer 2024. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
“The Conforming Effect: First Amendment Implications of [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Evinger, No. 06-2103 "In a prisoner's suit brought under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 against several correctional officials claiming that they retaliated against plaintiff because he tried to obtain evidence to defend himself against a disciplinary charge, dismissal of the suit is affirmed wh [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You’ve just lost some IP: (Securing Innovation), Competition – Film your IP issue: (WIPO), First WIPO Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP) meeting begins: (Intellectual Property Watch), (KEI Policy Blogs), (KEI Policy Blogs), (WIPO), One internet, two modes of governance: (IP Justice), Business, governments see momentum for global anti-counterfeiting treaty but EU snags: (Intellectual Property Watch), Intergovernmental… [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 10:18 am
On May 10, 2019, the SEC proposed a series of rule amendments and guidance with the intention of improving the regulatory framework governing cross-border security-based swaps. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Wood asked officials in his home state of Georgia to “retire” his law license in light of “disciplinary proceedings pending against me. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 7:30 pm
And were that the case, then the drafters of SB 94 would have had no reason to amend B&P Code 10026 to prohibit DRE licensees from breaking up loan modification services into component parts. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am
Accepts, amends, or rejects work of subordinates and subordinate supervisors. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
” The Court of Appeal agreed with the judge that the last passage from Reynolds had to be revised: [2010] EMLR 26 at [21]:- “..although the point was not mentioned in Jameel [2007] 1 AC 359, I agree with the Judge (at … paragraph 146) that the last sentence in the passage quoted above .. from Lord Nicholls’s opinion cannot stand following the 1998 Act: it is clear from In re S .. [read post]
