Search for: "IN RE: B.R."
Results 101 - 120
of 1,123
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2020, 6:58 am
See In re Wolf, 162 B.R. 98 (Bankr. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 6:58 am
See In re Wolf, 162 B.R. 98 (Bankr. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 8:46 am
In re Kiley, 595 B.R. 595 (Bankr. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am
Heritage Bank (In re Hart), 564 F. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 7:35 am
(In re SemCrude, L.P.), 407 B.R. 140 (Bankr.D.Del. 2009). [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS In re: : Chapter 11 : Murray Metallurgical Coal : Case No. 20-10390 Holdings, LLC, et al., : : Judge Hoffman : Debtors [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 1:39 pm
Corp., 314 B.R. 611 (Bankr. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 1:39 pm
Corp., 314 B.R. 611 (Bankr. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:04 pm
Fla. 1996); In re Chapman, 146 B.R. 411, 416 (Bankr. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON In re: GYPC, INC., Debtor Case No. 17‐31030 Adv. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON In re: TAGNETICS INC., Case No. 19‐30822 Judge Humphrey Chapter 7 Decision Granting Petitioning Creditors’ Motion for Contempt (Doc. 145) and Determining Additional Interest as a Remedy to Enforce Compliance This matter is before the court on the Motion to Hold Tagnetics in Indirect Contempt (doc. 145) (the “Motion”), filed by petitioning creditors Jonathan… [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am
See In re Klitsch, 587 B.R. 287 (Bankr. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:19 am
In re Hardigan, 490 B.R. 437, 458 (Bankr. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:56 am
Co., L.L.C., 291 B.R. 727 (Bankr. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 6:52 pm
In re Flanary & Sons Trucking, Inc., 93 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2004-1078 (Bankr. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 6:02 am
(See In re Ruiz, 515 B.R. 362, “Where a law firm entered into a limited representation agreement with the debtor, failed to sign the petition, failed to formally appear in the bankruptcy case or directly file the petition, and failed to attend the meeting of creditors or provide other necessary services to the debtor, the law firm’s attempt to limit their services was prohibited by Bankr. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 1:58 pm
Dean Witter, 83 F.3d 132 (6th Cir. 1996) Texas In re Wakefield, 293 B.R. 372 (N.D. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 3:16 pm
In re Thomas, 355 B.R. 166, 170 (N.D. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 6:41 pm
In re Thomas, 355 B.R. 166, 170 (N.D. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 10:05 am
§ 621.05; see also In re Adams, 389 B.R. 762 (Bankr. [read post]
