Search for: "IN RE ADOPTION OF B.R"
Results 101 - 120
of 188
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2011, 3:18 am
Fla. 1998); see also In re Wrubleski, 380 B.R. 635, 639 (Bankr. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:22 am
" She cited a pre-DOMA case, In re Favre, 186 B.R. 769 (Bankr. [read post]
28 May 2011, 7:56 am
B.R. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
We took a look at a case called Birdsong v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
It talks about legal standards, and its logic is interesting (note: if you're bright, you'll be able to tell what parts of the opinion could just as easily gone the other way if the Court had so chosen). [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:42 pm
See e.g., In re New Valley Corp., 2000 WL 1251858, at 91-12 (D.N.J.2000); In re Andover Togs, Inc., 231 B.R. 521, 545-46 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y. 1999); In re Today's Woman of Florida, Inc., 195 B.R. 506, 507-08 (Bankr.M.D.Fla. 1996); In re Gantos, Inc., 176 B.R. 793, 795-96 (Bankr.W.D.Mich.1995); In re Financial News Network, Inc., 149 B.R. 348, 351 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1993); In re Communicall Central, Inc., 106… [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
But we’re not talking about most judges… we’re talking about the Honorable Judge Robert E. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
Parker (In re Parker), 139 F.3d 668 (9th Cir. 1998). [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 12:22 am
See In re Pak, 343 B.R. 239 (Bankr. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:05 pm
Particularly instructive in this case is the following from Zick: We believe the following language from In re Krohn, 886 F.2d 123 (6th Cir. 1989), aff'g 87 B.R. 926 (Bankr. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:51 pm
Chartis also notes that two such decisions (allowing assignment) are pending before the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, citing In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc., 385 B.R. 560, 567 (Bankr. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:12 pm
The case, In re Broward Kitchens & Baths, Inc., ___ B.R. ____ (Bankr. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 5:47 am
§ 2415 (2008); see also In re Dow Corning, 250 B.R. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm
Originally Published October 14, 2009 Introduction Nowadays, background checks of prospective employees are the rule, not the exception. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
In In re Dow Corning Corp., 250 B.R. 298, 362-63 (Bankr. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am
The court did not adopt this interpretation, because doing so would require it to “read [KRS 426.190] in isolation and disregard the decisions of the Kentucky courts in Hoffmann, [Barton, and Hayes]. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am
The court did not adopt this interpretation, because doing so would require it to “read [KRS 426.190] in isolation and disregard the decisions of the Kentucky courts in Hoffmann, [Barton, and Hayes].” [read post]
6 May 2010, 5:07 am
Va. 2009) (adopting the UCC definition of "goods"); accord In re Goody's Family Clothing, Inc., 401 B.R. 131, 134 (Bankr. [read post]
6 May 2010, 5:07 am
Va. 2009) (adopting the UCC definition of "goods"); accord In re Goody's Family Clothing, Inc., 401 B.R. 131, 134 (Bankr. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
Law professor Marc Edelman suggests that, “[i]f the court adopts the NFL’s single-entity concept, it would change everything. [read post]
