Search for: "IN RE ADOPTION OF PROCEDURES FOR THE NOTICE AND FILING OF OPINIONS" Results 101 - 120 of 497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm by Bernard Bell
  Section 340B was adopted as a part of the Veterans Health Care Act of 1992. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 5:54 am by April Falcon Doss
And fourth, that the legally-compliant privacy notices we’re presented with when opting into a service or product are so mechanical and opaque that they do little to help us make meaningfully-informed decisions about the use of our data. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am by MBettman
The same day Graham came out, Moore filed a notice of appeal from the nunc pro tunc revised sentencing entry. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:19 pm by Gregory Forman
I’ve avoided blogging about the June 12, 2013 Supreme Court opinion in Ware v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:25 am by Dennis Crouch
Bramhall of Quinn Emanuel[i] Introduction On December 1, 2015, as part of a sweeping set of amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 84 and its Appendix of Forms were abrogated. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:40 am by Samantha Fry, Masha Simonova
The notice must be fairly detailed: It must include “(1) notice of the right to counsel; (2) notice that if the person or owner is indigent, the court will appoint counsel for that person or owner; (3) notice of the reason for the order for isolation, quarantine, or closure; (4) notice of whether the order is an immediate order, and if so, the time frame for the Department to seek consent or to file a petition requesting a court order as… [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 2:39 pm
The en banc decision dropped a bomb on the entire computer forensics world, without any briefing or even notice, and most of its rules are hard to square with relevant Supreme Court doctrine and/or the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am by John Jascob
In the 2014 case of Halliburton II, the Supreme Court re-affirmed the Basic v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
Tsekhanovich, No. 05-4809"Conviction and sentence for false statements, mail fraud, and health care fraud-related charges is affirmed where the district court did not exceed its allowable discretion by admitting challenged testimony, as the government demonstrated that the lay opinion testimony was sufficiently based on and rationally derived from the witness's first-hand perceptions. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 11:10 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Since 1/1/2020, the revised  Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA2020) are in force. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
While the Court cast this as a procedural due process decision, the Court's opinion makes clear that a jury may not impose punishment for nonparty harms regardless of the procedures in place, so the holding smells quite substantive to me (and the dissenters). [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This could not have surprised the applicant given that the applicant itself referred to pertinent jurisprudence of the boards of appeal and to a Practice and Procedure Notice of the EPO (PPN 04/08; […]).[3.1] However, the mere reference to jurisprudence of the boards of appeal does not, by itself, constitute or replace an argument in a first instance decision. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 7:58 am
Having the same procedure apply to the Rules of Procedure of the Enlarged Board of Appeal, the highest judicial instance under the EPC, aggravates the matter even further. [read post]