Search for: "IN RE G.S."
Results 101 - 120
of 299
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2020, 2:21 pm
See, e.g., In re M.B., 175 N.C. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:55 am
While an individual bond agent could have filed this motion pro se, G.S. 84-5 dictates that a corporation must appear in court through a licensed attorney and cannot proceed pro se. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 1:33 pm
G.S. 15A-284.5 mandates double blind administration, sequential lineups, and a host of other best practices of ID procedure. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 1:33 pm
G.S. 15A-284.5 mandates double blind administration, sequential lineups, and a host of other best practices of ID procedure. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 6:54 am
See G.S. 20-4.01(4a). [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:34 pm
[Amicus brief challenging California rifle ban] The Ninth Circuit case Rupp v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:33 pm
See, e.g., In re D.I., 204 N.C. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 1:44 pm
In re Superior Court Order, 315 N.C. 378 (1986) (applying standard to disclosure of bank records); In re Brooks, 143 N.C. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 4:20 am
In In Re: Z.A.K., 189 N.C. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 2:10 pm
The defendant argued that this procedure violated the requirements of G.S. 15A-1234 and G.S. 15A-1236, which require that responses to jury questions and additional instructions be in open court and which prohibit speaking to the jury. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:39 pm
The Nash County Health Department immediately suspended the food establishment operating permit of Doug Saul’s Bar-B-Que & Seafood, located on 813 Western Avenue in Nashville, NC on Friday, Nov. 22, pursuant to G.S. 130A-23, as there were conditions present constituting an imminent health hazard. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:17 am
” G.S. 15A-646. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
See In re J.L.K., 165 N.C. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 10:50 am
[The statute, G.S. 15A-1368.4, has since been amended to substitute “directly related” for “reasonably related. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:11 am
Law enforcement acted under G.S. 15A-262, requiring a showing only of “relevance” to an investigation, and did not obtain a search warrant. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
” G.S. 14-159.12(a). [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 9:20 am
App. __ (Oct. 1, 2019) Defendant was charged by citation with misdemeanor larceny under G.S. 14-72. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:58 pm
You can read the full history here (it’s not that long, and if you’re a reader of this blog I know you’ll find it interesting), but the short version goes like this. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:23 am
” In addition, the Juvenile Order found: “On this date, the Court has entered an order pursuant to N.C.G.S. 50- 13.1, 50-13, 50-13.5 and 50-13.7, as provided in G.S. 7B-911, awarding joint custody of the child” to Plaintiff and Defendant. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 9:54 pm
But it’s not clear why you need to enumerate any specific ranges at all if you’re going to also include a catch-all provision that would have covered everything in those ranges . . . and more. [read post]
