Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
The Superior Court Appellate Division upheld a lower court's decision that New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Co. properly denied coverage to a policyholder identified only as "D.V. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 10:46 am
Sheriff, and Clerk of Lake Superior Court - "Herbert Smith appeals the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants Lake County ("the County") and clerk of the Lake Superior Court ("the Clerk") on the basis that Smith's claim regarding the enforcement of Indiana Code Section 35-33-8.5-4 is barred by res judicata. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 12:58 pm
But if you're late only because you didn't get notice of the appealable order, the district court can reopen your window to appeal for 14 days. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 12:30 pm
If you're the government, the court will raise the argument for you. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
The citation must include the parenthetical “not designated for publication. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
Pennsylvania (1971) and this Court's holding in In re Agler (1969) that because the fundamental objectives of juvenile proceedings are different than those of an adult criminal prosecution, juvenile offenders do not have a constitutional right to have their cases decided by a jury. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 10:26 am
In Garcetti, the closely divided Court held that, when public employees make statements “pursuant to their official duties,” such speech is not protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:59 pm
But it’s often not clear whether a particular statement falls within it; this Appeals Court of Massachusetts decision from last Friday (Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 8:54 am
"
In re Election Law Enforcement Commission Advisory Opinion No. 01-2008ELECTION LAW - Campaign Funds - Criminal Defense Costs"An elected official may not use campaign funds to pay legal expenses incurred in defending himself against federal criminal charges"
FEDERAL DECISIONS:
Hedgpeth v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 4:02 am
The court applies a reasonableness balancing approach instead of the warrant requirement because it is a non-criminal search program. [read post]
2 May 2023, 6:10 am
I started wondering about that question after reading last month’s decision by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Carolina Youth Action Project v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Robot lawyers might not be here yet but you’re already using AI when you do legal research on Westlaw. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 8:30 am
In her appeal, Kelly argues that prosecutors overreached, and that the Third Circuit has established a dangerous precedent on prosecuting public officials that conflicts with Supreme Court jurisprudence. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:26 pm
State from Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Presiding Judge Sharon Keller, dissenting from that court's decision not to review a lower court decision: Appellant has been charged with two counts of the offense of sending harassing electronic communications. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 8:17 pm
"Nothing in our ruling prevents law enforcement officers or our courts from vigorously enforcing section 290," he said, "but they must do so only with regard to what the statute actually criminalizes. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
It held that the March 31, 2021 amendment to Family Court Act § 1046(a)(iii) should be retroactively applied to events that occurred, and a Family Court decision that was rendered, prior to March 2021. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 12:53 pm
City of Pittsburg, a split panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a police officer who speaks to FBI agents about police misconduct, is doing so pursuant to his official duties as a police officer. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Criminal Law: Official LanguagesBessette v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 12:30 pm
No news may mean that the court already ruled on the motion, and the time to appeal is ticking away. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 12:29 pm
After all, if an appellate court wrongly denies a petition for mandamus to a district court, that decision can be remedied through certiorari — as the justices did just last term in In re United States. [read post]
