Search for: "IN RE SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY"
Results 101 - 120
of 169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
How much money a 'patent troll' makes (The Prior Art) Hospital TTO takes a different path to commercialisation with private sale of IP (Technology Transfer Tactics) US Patents - Decisions CAFC: Attendance at single trade show to display infringing product sufficient for personal jurisdiction: Synthes (U.S.A.) v G.M. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
Seagate Technology Holdings, Inc., 177 Cal.App.4th 734 (Sept. 15, 2009) (which was handed down while I was away on vacation), the Court of Appeal overruled objections to a classwide settlement, but reversed the final judgment and remanded for notice to be re-given with an amended class definition. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:41 am
Stopping new and useful technology from entering the stream of commerce could significantly slow the development of that technology, and interfere with the development of other technologies. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 2:11 pm
But it’s well within the usual range of $50-100 million that most acquirers pay for technology that has not yet matured into a business. [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 9:51 pm
Such a view was inconsistent with Seagate. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 1:51 pm
The Patent Reform Act of 2009 also proposes: changing the patent filing system to a first to file system; revising the prior art definition to include inventions that were "otherwise available to the public"; permitting a company to file an application on behalf of an inventor when there is an obligation to assign; eliminating interferences; expanding inter partes reexamination; codifying the 2007 In re Seagate Technology, LLC decision's standard for willful… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) Conference Board of Canada ‘cut and paste’ caper; CBC recalls three reports (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (Copyfight) J D Salinger sues over unauthorised sequel to ‘Catcher in the Rye’… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) Conference Board of Canada ‘cut and paste’ caper; CBC recalls three reports (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (Copyfight) J D Salinger sues over unauthorised sequel to ‘Catcher in the Rye’… [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 12:00 am
It's good to know which zone they're in at the moment before buying. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 12:00 am
It's good to know which zone they're in at the moment before buying. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 5:35 pm
(e^ip note: critical to understand in initial claim drafting and prior art analysis)In re Seagate Technology, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:54 pm
In re Seagate Technology, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat) Global Global – General Moral rights famous… [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica) Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP) Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
27 Nov 2008, 4:07 am
Back it up Technology is awesome, but losing your data sucks. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 9:50 pm
New developments relating to the issue of privilege waiver in patent cases arise in In re Seagate Technology and inNilssen v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism (IAM) The… [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 9:55 pm
In addition, the Federal Circuit rejected the defendant's contention that In re Seagate changed the evidentiary burden for proving intent in the context of inducing infringement. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 12:31 pm
As in our recent decision in In re Seagate Technology, LLC, we "leave it to future cases to further develop the application of this standard. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 10:01 pm
Like any other tech company, Seagate has a lot of IP litigation to deal with and has been involved in the long-running In Re Seagate Technologies, in which the company is fighting infringement and trade secret claims. [read post]
