Search for: "IN RE VIOLATION OF RULE 50"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2019, 2:54 pm
Ambiguities in the current more than 50-year-old Labor Department regulations implementing the regular rate requirement rules discourage employers from offering more perks to their employees because of uncertainty about whether the perks are required to be included in the regular rate of pay for purposes of calculating overtime pay. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 11:42 am
He had two suits ruled on today. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 10:59 am
Chapter 1923 re: judicial eviction proceedings. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
The potential unintended consequences of such a rule are staggering. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 11:04 am
Lineups have been deemed acceptable police procedures for over 50 years now. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:52 am
We do not believe that this option satisfies the COPPA Rule. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 9:32 am
The ruling further stated: The entire premise of the Republicans’ suit is that if the exemption from the 50-person cap on gatherings for free-exercise activated were found to be unconstitutional, they would then be free to gather in whatever numbers they wished. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:22 am
For the answer to that question, you can purchase our 50 State Gifting and Rebating Survey here. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:22 am
For the answer to that question, you can purchase our 50 State Gifting and Rebating Survey here. [read post]
6 May 2020, 8:57 am
While some countries remain locked down, others, have recently initiated progressive measures to re-open businesses and return employees to the workplace, with varying degrees of success: Germany: On April 27 Germany began allowing shops as large as 8,600 square feet to re-open, as well as book stores, car dealerships and bike shops, provided that they continue to adhere to strict social distancing and sanitation rules. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 12:47 pm
The ruling of University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:03 pm
That is the rule in the In re Ennis (4th Cir. 2009). [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 8:56 am
(If you're using an attorney to draft or review your releases -- as you should -- he or she will no doubt find the brevity of the EEOC's sample language humorous.) [read post]
A New Federal Court Minimum Wage Ruling Could Offer Huge Benefits for Some Tipped Workers in Georgia
17 Sep 2021, 9:49 am
Allegedly, L.R. spent anywhere from 30-50% of her time at work engaged in these non-tip-generating duties. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 12:47 pm
In re AE Liquidation, Inc., No. 16-2203, slip op. (3rd Cir., Apr. 4, 2017). [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 3:00 pm
The Bureau’s complaint is not a finding or ruling that the defendants have actually violated the law. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:48 pm
(As I understand it, the individual claimed -- wrongly -- that the definition of customer which excluded feeder fund investors was from the statute rather than from judicial rulings.) [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 9:02 am
Which rules were violated? [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 9:02 am
Which rules were violated? [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 10:26 am
According to the NOV, the FM licensee is somehow violating the rules and is supposed to be taking corrective actions. [read post]
