Search for: "IN RE WYETH"
Results 101 - 120
of 702
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 8:02 am
Wyeth Supreme Court decision. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 11:03 am
The #2 case on our list of bottom ten cases from 2010, Wyeth v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:50 pm
The FTC hoped to assist the court in its analysis of the economic realities of the challenged agreement, it said.The plaintiffs in the Effexor action allege that in 2005, Wyeth and Teva entered into a so-called “No-AG” agreement, whereby Wyeth agreed to refrain from marketing an authorized generic (“AG”) version of Effexor XR during Teva’s 180 exclusivity period under the Hatch-Waxman Act, in exchange for Teva’s agreement to delay introduction of… [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:50 pm
The FTC hoped to assist the court in its analysis of the economic realities of the challenged agreement, it said.The plaintiffs in the Effexor action allege that in 2005, Wyeth and Teva entered into a so-called “No-AG” agreement, whereby Wyeth agreed to refrain from marketing an authorized generic (“AG”) version of Effexor XR during Teva’s 180 exclusivity period under the Hatch-Waxman Act, in exchange for Teva’s agreement to delay introduction of… [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:50 pm
The FTC hoped to assist the court in its analysis of the economic realities of the challenged agreement, it said.The plaintiffs in the Effexor action allege that in 2005, Wyeth and Teva entered into a so-called “No-AG” agreement, whereby Wyeth agreed to refrain from marketing an authorized generic (“AG”) version of Effexor XR during Teva’s 180 exclusivity period under the Hatch-Waxman Act, in exchange for Teva’s agreement to delay introduction of… [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
Here's a link to Herrmann's op-ed piece about Wyeth v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 3:00 am
The third and final paragraph simply notes that Wyeth v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 9:46 pm
As we saw in the Wyeth v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 5:00 am
Wyeth, No. 09-722, 2009 WL 1089663 (E.D. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 6:46 am
Wyeth, a recent decision of the Eighth U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 9:33 am
For that reason, we won't rehash the details in this post (besides, we're too busy dancing!). [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:42 am
Wyeth, Inc., Nos. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 7:11 am
Wyeth, Inc., No. 08-3850, slip op. (8th Cir. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 6:15 am
Wyeth-Ayerst Labs., 385 F.3d 961, 965-66 (6th Cir. 2004). [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 10:44 pm
That's second only to Wyeth v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 6:34 am
(Wyeth, 555 U.S. at p. 578; see id. at p. 579 [“State tort suits uncover unknown drug hazards and provide incentives for drug manufacturers to disclose safety risks promptly. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 11:56 am
Otherwise, you’re protected, since the statute did not include any clauses recognizing design defect claims. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Wyeth (hormone therapy) Deposition2007-12-20 In re Prempro PLL (hormone therapy) Deposition2008-02-01 Rix v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 2:33 pm
Wyeth, 619 F.3d 632 (6th Cir. 2010) and Tobin v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 2:09 am
I have a prescription to a hand therapy center in the Big City a long haul away (bus + train + bus), and they're checking my insurance. [read post]
