Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: R. S. T., A CHILD (MOTHER)"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2020, 5:26 am
In addition, the court did not undertake an analysis of the child’s best interests. [read post]
22 May 2020, 12:30 pm
Which is irrational, it is argued, imposing hardship on hundreds of thousands of people while furthering no gov't interests. [read post]
8 May 2020, 7:05 am
I think that restrictions on non-ideological speech ("your mother is a whore" or "your father's new wife is a whore") said to the child, justified by the interest in protecting the child's relationship with the other parent should generally be constitutional. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:59 am
Most clauses in a parenting agreement are very straightforward such as “Dad will pick up the child on Fridays at 6PM at mother’s house. [read post]
2 May 2020, 5:02 am
Sardi, and it clearly states that the [c]ourt gave sole legal custody of the child to the mother because of [Sardi]'s admitted actions in continuing to disobey court orders. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 10:40 am
Hooper is expecting a child” with this woman. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 8:42 am
This error influenced the applicable burden of proof and permeated the court's assessment of the child's best interests. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 4:52 pm
Meaningful and personal contact with both parents is assumed to be in the best interests of the child. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 2:14 pm
Child molestation. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
March 16, 2020 Recent Articles of Interest An article by Joel R. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 6:28 am
App. 2000) (best interests of the child are a compelling state interest justifying infringement on a mother's constitutional right to travel), review denied (Minn. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 9:11 am
— Texas Bar Blog Stay-home orders don’t impact child custody plans, high court orders — Under Texas cities’ stay-home orders, ex-spouses who share child custody were confused about whether they could still take their child back and forth for visitations. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 5:02 am
This right creates a strong presumption, and the Fifth Circuit held it wasn't rebutted here: First, the district court weighed in favor of non-disclosure "the child's privacy interest in being protected from financial predators or others who would harass the child simply because they know the amount received when the suit was settled. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 5:03 am
[OK, the backstory isn't as grim as in Chinatown, but it's an interesting case.] [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 5:01 am
[T]he Children have resided in Yemen with Father for several years prior to [Mother's] commencement of these custody proceedings in New York. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 10:37 pm
Under New Zealand law, however, the surrogacy arrangement would have no legal effect, and the surrogate mother and her partner would be treated as the child’s legal parents upon the child’s birth. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 1:34 pm
But if the mother couldn't live in Brussels and stayed in London, I expect she likely wouldn't have remained childless; presumably she would have met some other man and had a child with him, thus owing that family to Britain's nonmembership of the EU. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 5:58 pm
Presumably, doctors don’t perform surgery solely based on a mother’s made up claims. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm
Under Indiana law, if a woman in an opposite-sex marriage gives birth, her husband is presumed to be the child's biological father and is listed on the birth certificate. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 2:24 pm
[T]he Convention’s mandate of return ‘gives way before the primary interest of any person in not being exposed to physical or psychological danger. [read post]
