Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF S.L."
Results 101 - 120
of 158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2010, 11:11 am
Rolabo, S.L., 437 F.3d 1157, 1161 (Fed. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
.,2019), the Appellate Division held, as a matter of first impression for the Court, that, in a proceeding to establish standing to assert parental rights in seeking visitation and custody under Domestic Relations Law § 70, the court has the discretion to direct the “more monied” party to pay the other party’s counsel and expert fees under Domestic Relations Law § 237 before that party has been adjudicated a parent. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 10:37 am
This language was added to the Juvenile Code through S.L. 1983-532, Sec. 1. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
Where the address of either party and any child or children is unknown and not a matter of public record, or is subject to an existing confidentiality order pursuant to DRL section 254 or FCA section 154-b, such applications may be brought in the county where the judgment was entered; and it is further(4) Additional Requirement with Respect to Uncontested and Contested Judgments of Divorce. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
Where the address of either party and any child or children is unknown and not a matter of public record, or is subject to an existing confidentiality order pursuant to DRL section 254 or FCA section 154-b, such applications may be brought in the county where the judgment was entered; and it is further(4) Additional Requirement with Respect to Uncontested and Contested Judgments of Divorce. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Circumstances of contemporary daily interactions between men and women, warrants that the “opportunity” element of proof of adultery must be interpreted to mean more that mere “proximity,” but must instead necessarily mean “proximity plus. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 5:43 am
S.L. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:34 pm
S.L. 2017-57, sec. 16C.2. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 3:12 pm
S.L. 2008-129. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 7:53 am
Should it matter? [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 8:55 am
The legislation, S.L. 2019-91 (H 770), received bipartisan support, passing both chambers unanimously. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 10:49 am
The offense occurred on December 13, 2015, long before the raise the age legislation was passed (S.L. 2017-57, §§ 16D.4. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 12:51 pm
Subdivision (a)(3)—the rule that banned covered offenders from any place where minors gathered for “regularly scheduled” programs—was deemed vague as a matter of constitutional due process. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:08 pm
Just days after Miller was decided in 2012, the General Assembly enacted S.L. 2012-148, which was eventually codified in G.S. 15A-1340.19A through –1340.19D. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 12:51 pm
Subdivision (a)(3)—the rule that banned covered offenders from any place where minors gathered for “regularly scheduled” programs—was deemed vague as a matter of constitutional due process. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 6:57 pm
See Sims, 257 N.C. at 35 “(noting that “[t]he court should exclude from jury consideration matters in the record which are immaterial and irrelevant to the inquiry, and entries which amount to hearsay on hearsay”); State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 7:43 pm
See S.L. 1971, c. 590; see also G.S. 7A, Article 30. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:08 pm
Just days after Miller was decided in 2012, the General Assembly enacted S.L. 2012-148, which was eventually codified in G.S. 15A-1340.19A through –1340.19D. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 8:33 am
or(b) must the Community design court rely on national law governing designs in accordance with Article 88(2) ["On all matters not covered by this Regulation, a Community design court shall apply its national law, including its private international law" -- but Art. 14(1) does apply so there should be no need to lose sleep over this, surely?] [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 11:35 am
S.L. 2013-154. [read post]
