Search for: "ING Investments LLC" Results 101 - 120 of 163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2010, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  He also notes that during the period in question, "relations between the parties were adversarial, if not outright hostile, thereby negating as a matter of law any inference that business entities as sophisticated as plaintiffs were relying on defendants for an objective assessment of the value of their investment. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:48 am by Joy Waltemath
The appeals court, however, affirmed the lower court’s dismissal of the employee’s claims against several private equity investors (Guippone v BH S&B Holdings LLC, December 10, 2013, Pooler, R). [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 6:50 pm by Arthur F. Coon
County of San Bernardino (Dynamic Development, LLC, Real Party in Interest) (4th Dist., Div. 2, 2016) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2016 WL _____, Case No. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
Put simply, section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 1934 Act) grants the SEC the power to sanction a broker-dealer and its associated persons for “fail[ing] reasonably to supervise” another person, subject to his or her supervision, who has violated the 1934 Act.[4] The provision in the 1934 Act for failure to supervise parallels sections 203(e) and (f) of the Investment Advisers Act which applies to investment advisers. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm by Wolfgang Demino
., ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND FOR ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED, Petitioners,v.CASH BIZ, LP, CASH ZONE, LLC D/B/A CASH BIZ, AND REDWOOD FINANCIALS, LLC, Respondents.No. 16-0854.Supreme Court of Texas.Argued September 15, 2017.Opinion delivered: February 23, 2018. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
  The Court then refused to read ambiguous contractual language as “waiv[ing] any defense based on lack of personal jurisdiction and to consent to the jurisdiction of any court . [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:16 am by MBettman
”) In re Columbus Skyline Securities, Inc., 74 Ohio St.3d 495 (1996) (Ohio’s Security Act should be liberally construed in order to serve its purpose of “prevent[ing] the fraudulent exploitation of the investing public through the sale of securities. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 5:00 pm by Benjamin F. Jackson, Stephen P. Younger
  At the time of the alleged fraud, Class TT was managed by Albert Hallac (“Hallac”), Jeffrey Hallac (“Jeffrey”), and Keith Wellner, through Weston Capital Asset Management, LLC and its related affiliate Weston Capital Management LLC. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 5:00 pm by Benjamin F. Jackson, Stephen P. Younger
  At the time of the alleged fraud, Class TT was managed by Albert Hallac (“Hallac”), Jeffrey Hallac (“Jeffrey”), and Keith Wellner, through Weston Capital Asset Management, LLC and its related affiliate Weston Capital Management LLC. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: European Court of Justice raises bar for famous brand owners wishing to prove dilution: Intel Corporation v CPM United Kingdom (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPKat) (IPKat) (Class 46) RPX Corporation – Defensive patent aggregation club (Securing Innovation) (Patent Fools) (Patent Prospector) (Techdirt) (IAM) Peterlin's… [read post]