Search for: "ING Investments LLCĀ " Results 101 - 120 of 160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2013, 7:48 am by Joy Waltemath
The appeals court, however, affirmed the lower court’s dismissal of the employee’s claims against several private equity investors (Guippone v BH S&B Holdings LLC, December 10, 2013, Pooler, R). [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
Put simply, section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 1934 Act) grants the SEC the power to sanction a broker-dealer and its associated persons for “fail[ing] reasonably to supervise” another person, subject to his or her supervision, who has violated the 1934 Act.[4] The provision in the 1934 Act for failure to supervise parallels sections 203(e) and (f) of the Investment Advisers Act which applies to investment advisers. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 6:50 pm by Arthur F. Coon
County of San Bernardino (Dynamic Development, LLC, Real Party in Interest) (4th Dist., Div. 2, 2016) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2016 WL _____, Case No. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm by Wolfgang Demino
., ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND FOR ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED, Petitioners,v.CASH BIZ, LP, CASH ZONE, LLC D/B/A CASH BIZ, AND REDWOOD FINANCIALS, LLC, Respondents.No. 16-0854.Supreme Court of Texas.Argued September 15, 2017.Opinion delivered: February 23, 2018. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
  The Court then refused to read ambiguous contractual language as “waiv[ing] any defense based on lack of personal jurisdiction and to consent to the jurisdiction of any court . [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:16 am by MBettman
”) In re Columbus Skyline Securities, Inc., 74 Ohio St.3d 495 (1996) (Ohio’s Security Act should be liberally construed in order to serve its purpose of “prevent[ing] the fraudulent exploitation of the investing public through the sale of securities. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: European Court of Justice raises bar for famous brand owners wishing to prove dilution: Intel Corporation v CPM United Kingdom (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPKat) (IPKat) (Class 46) RPX Corporation – Defensive patent aggregation club (Securing Innovation) (Patent Fools) (Patent Prospector) (Techdirt) (IAM) Peterlin's… [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:41 am
Introduction   Patents have recently received a great deal of attention as tradable commodities, attracting the attention of several hedge funds, and giving rise to investment firms that specialize in patent acquisition.[1][2] This aspect is not unanticipated, and in fact is on its face congruent with the original means for attaining the goals behind patent law – “to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors… [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:53 pm by Ron Coleman
So too said the Eastern District of Virginia in 2014 in Belmora LLC. v. [read post]