Search for: "INTERNATIONAL CUSTOM PRODUCTS V US"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,177
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
Indeed, in McDonald’s II, the court reached back before Caremark to the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
Tort tries to get people to make safer products to encourage innovation, but also leads to anxieties about creating new stuff b/c it risks litigation v. doing what everyone else is already doing. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Basically, the Home Products case was properly before the Court of International Trade. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm
The SEC may also conduct an “examination,” which involves a thorough review of a company’s disclosures, marketing materials, compliance plans, and internal controls to determine whether they are aligned with actual business practices.[9] The SEC similarly will “assess whether ESG products are appropriately labeled and whether recommendations of such products for retail investors are made in the investors’ best interests. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 1:04 pm
In its report, Customs refused to disclose the numbers it used to calculate production capacity. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 7:34 am
Visa and Mastercard Can Now Be Used on China’s Biggest Payment AppsCNN – July 21, 2023 Visiting China just got a whole lot easier for international travelers. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 3:27 pm
These, however, are not typical days in customs law as the Section 301 duties imposed on products from China continue to raise issues. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
The S-K disclosures will be required for annual reports for fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2023, and the 8-K requirements come into force by December 18, 2023.[27] Companies will have only months to align their internal disclosure processes with the new incident reporting requirements. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:59 pm
Defendants, on the contrary, segmented the product market by age and sex of customers, together with the price and quality of the shoes. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 6:55 am
Sandoz Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 9:05 am
” As the Ninth Circuit held in Sebastian International v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Only approximately 3% of Abitron’s overall global sales were direct sales to US customers. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:57 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum (2013), Jesner v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 8:03 am
As you'll see below, a lot of this feels unjust to customs lawyers who are used to a being able to deploy standard litigation tools including discovery and witness testimony to prove their case.As an example, you should take a look at Leco Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 2:55 am
Conditions to Obtain a Preliminary Injunction So, you have got your patents – now you have to decide where to use them! [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:11 am
The product must be customized and expressive The Court repeatedly emphasized the unusual nature of the product Lorrie Smith, the website designer, proposed to sell: working closely with each individual customer to tailor specific and original messages by using Smith's own words and designs. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:17 am
Royalty-free use for the first few years? [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:49 pm
Contractors can also use DCAA’s published audit guidance to identify and respond to aggressive audit positions that may be inconsistent with DCAA’s official policies, procedures, and interpretations. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:01 am
Comment To support the BoA's conclusion, the customs in the relevant sector could have been taken into account. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 2:30 am
By Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert & Anne K. [read post]
