Search for: "IPR LICENSING, INC." Results 101 - 120 of 278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2018, 8:15 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
After the IPR was instituted in September 2016, Plaintiff offered to license the ‘327 patent to Defendant for $150,000.00. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 8:15 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
After the IPR was instituted in September 2016, Plaintiff offered to license the ‘327 patent to Defendant for $150,000.00. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am by Dennis Crouch
AOL Inc., et al., No. 14-1358 Interval Licensing LLC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am by Dennis Crouch
AOL Inc., et al., No. 14-1358 Interval Licensing LLC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 10:39 pm by Shouvik Kumar Guha
Anubha followed this up with an update on the Indo-EU FTA negotiations, including India’s positive stance that it cannot go beyond the parameters of the TRIPS and its domestic IPR laws and its demand of being declared a data-secure country. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm by Florian Mueller
Footnote 10 of Apple's letter recalls what the FTC itself thought Google would actually have to do now:"Remarks of Chairman Jon Leibowitz, Google Press Conference (Jan. 3, 2013), available at http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/leibowitz/130103googleleibowitzremarks.pdf ('Google's settlement with the Commission requires Google to abandon its claims for injunctive relief on any of its standard essential patents with a FRAND commitment, and to offer a license on FRAND terms to any company that wants… [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 8:33 am by Chijioke Okorie
Apple Inc., the windowing arrangements made by the defendant publishers came up in antitrust proceedings before the US Court of Appeal, 2nd Circuit. [read post]
20 May 2012, 12:59 pm by Stan
With respect to Motorola’s patent portfolio, Google will be able to use those IPRs to force unreasonable licensing conditions, which could reduce competition and ultimately harm consumers. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 6:11 pm by Tom Fisher
The second report to be prepared by the ITC in connection with the ‘519 investigation  will (i) describe the size and scope of reported IPR infringement in China; (ii) provide a quantitative analysis of the effect of reported IPR infringement in China on the U.S. economy and U.S. jobs, including  on a sectoral basis, as well as potential effects on sales, profits, royalties, and license fees of U.S. firms globally, to the extent primary data can be… [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 11:39 am by Dennis Crouch
Apple, Inc., et al., No. 15-842 (IPR institution decisions unreviewable, even when addressed in a final written decision by PTAB) Post Grant Admin: Interval Licensing LLC v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 4:02 pm
When the expression of an idea is inseparable from its function it forms part of the idea and is not entitled to the protection of copyright (see Autodesk Inc v Dyason [1992] HCA 2; (1992) 22 IPR 163 at 172). [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 10:09 am
A more recent decision on FRAND royalty calculation is Ericsson Inc v D-Link Sys., Inc 773 F. 3d 1201 (Fed. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 10:37 am by Sai Vinod
This course focuses on the interlinking between the competition law and IPR. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
(Class 46) How to get the wrong invention searched (Tufty the Cat) Formula One licensing crashes out in TM opposition: Case T-10/09 Formula One Licensing BV v OHIM (IPKat) Mediterranean airlines safe in Luxembourg – General Court confirms no likelihood of confusion in Case T-194/09 Lan Airlines v OHMI – Air Nostrum (Class 46) General Court confirms likelihood of confusion between Yorma’s and Norma (Class 46) General Court rejects INSULATE FOR LIFE: T-157/08 (Class… [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 am
: (LawFont),BrazilBrazil pays the price for compulsory licensing: (IAM), (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), CanadaThe Chronicle reports that Honourable Mr. [read post]