Search for: "Image Point Inc" Results 101 - 120 of 2,046
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2014, 5:55 am
Citron points out that these restrictions should only apply in particular circumstances:Revenge porn laws should apply only if a defendant disclosed another person’s nude image knowing that person expected the image to be kept private and had not consented to the disclosure. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:38 am by Scott Bialecki
The full decision can be found at http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/08-1511.pdf. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
First, the backstory from an earlier (May 2022) decision in the case: Around December 2021, defendant Mason Rothschild created digital images of faux-fur-covered versions of the luxury Birkin handbags of plaintiffs Hermes International and Hermès of Paris, Inc. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
Note, that case is not exactly on point with your situation and to see why, check out this article (scroll down to "C. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:10 pm by Mark St. Amour
” The method include capturing images of the same scene from two different points of view, i.e., parallax images, and then displaying the images in an alternating fashion to the viewer to create the appearance of three-dimensionality. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 1:41 pm by Dennis Crouch
SurgiSil’s cosmetic lip implant has a remarkably similar shape to lots of other two-pointed cylinders. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 9:22 pm by Florian Mueller
If they also disagree on Samsung's currently-imported products, then we will either get news at some point of Samsung shipments being held by U.S. customs or of an enforcement proceeding being instigated by Apple.The filings related to a partial return or forfeiture of bonds are confidential, but the headlines are publicly accessible (click on the image to enlarge or read the text below the image):01/07/2014 12:40 PMCommission Investigative Staff's Response to Samsung… [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 6:34 am by Ray Dowd
Image from http://www.ivi.tv/ viewed 3/13/2010In WPIX, Inc. v. ivi, Inc. 10 Civ. 715(SDNY Feb 22, 2010), Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald granted a preliminary injunction under the Second Circuit's standard set forth in Salinger v. [read post]
  The court noted that the Third Circuit has yet to address the issue of whether e-discovery costs are taxable but pointed to the Sixth Circuit which has held that electronic scanning and imaging could be interpreted as “exemplification” and “copies” of paper. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Mr Mosley and his advisers saw their chance, and by a claim form issued on 23 July 2014 Mr Mosley claimed damages and injunctive relief against Google Inc and its wholly owned UK subsidiary, Google UK for: (1) misuse of private information in publishing it by directing searches to website addresses displaying the images, and (2) under sections 10 and/or 13 and14 of the DPA. [read post]