Search for: "In INTEREST OF DH v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2015, 7:17 am
The parties in United States v. [read post]
Divided court declines to reinstate Biden’s immigration guidelines, sets case for argument this fall
21 Jul 2022, 5:47 pm
” They portrayed the new policy as “the product of escalating lawlessness by DHS” and another chapter in “DHS’s serial refusals to consider the reliance interests of states. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 1:32 pm
In USA v. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 7:09 am
DHS, the federal lawsuit filed last week by Texas and other states aiming to block the new Keeping Families Together (KFT) process. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
The State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am
Department of State – Bureau of Consular Affairs stated: “As part of this initiative, the Department will clarify existing guidance to consular officers related to when they should consider recommending that DHS grant a waiver of ineligibility, where applicable… These clarifications will describe when consular officers should consider recommending that the Department of Homeland Security waive ineligibility for these applicants on an expedited basis, in… [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 6:36 am
But the more telling stat is DHS's second-place standing. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:09 pm
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 6:41 am
During the Biden administration, DHS scanned social media for other targets, such as Americans discussing abortion after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 3:00 am
DHS (N.D. [read post]
16 May 2022, 5:01 am
From Chief Judge Beryl Howell's opinion in Doe v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:21 pm
Norfolk Southern Railway v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:36 am
Indeed, the existence of those benefits provided the basis for the Chief's "reliance interest" analysis in DHS v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 5:53 pm
Twenty-six states joined Texas in the litigation (United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 10:06 am
But if that's their concern, there is an obvious conflict here between the administration's interests and the public interest. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 10:28 pm
Update: The Supreme Court of the United States this morning granted the petition for rehearing in Liberty University v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 10:50 pm
In PayPal, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
This case struck me as factually interesting because the agency—the South Dakota National Guard—has “dual federal-state status. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
See, e.g., AARP v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:38 am
" <> Coal River Energy, LLC v. [read post]
