Search for: "In Interest of Jamie L"
Results 101 - 120
of 143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
And I kind of like it; it’s fun and interesting and it’s important. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 2:05 pm
Cir. 1981) (“an agency must receive and respond to petitions for rulemaking”); Nat’l Parks Conserv. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 5:05 am
L. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 1:19 am
Solo Stephen L. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
On the same day there was an application in Soriano v Societe d’exploitation de l’Hebdomadaire Le Point before Collins Rice J. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
Jamie Grischkan, Banking and the Antimonopoly Tradition: The Long Road to the Bank Holding Company Act in Antimonopoly and American Democracy (Daniel A. [read post]
26 May 2021, 6:39 pm
However, the near-zero interest rates anticipated by analysts at PwC through 2021 should promote recovery and growth for those businesses that will have survived through the pandemic [7]. [read post]
26 May 2021, 6:39 pm
However, the near-zero interest rates anticipated by analysts at PwC through 2021 should promote recovery and growth for those businesses that will have survived through the pandemic [7]. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
Timothy L. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 5:00 am
Jamie Flatt The parties had two young children when they divorced in 2008. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:17 pm
Pages 27, 28 &29 outline what the case is all about, and page 28, item ‘f’ is particularly interesting in my opinion [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
L. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am
Held, there was substantial public interest in protecting the particular “expression” in the disputed article, which outweighed the modest seriousness of the harm suffered by the Article’s publication. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
– obvious errors in Crovitz’ article (IAM) (IP Watchdog) Bilski at the BPAI – What a mess (Part 1 – Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) PPAC meeting sets the stage for patent quality improvements (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Did you know... that public interest factors can trump the finding of a violation at the ITC? [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 7:14 am
Indeed, they are utterly contrary to the best interests of Baseball. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 1:47 pm
The appeal would have turned into a major civil liberties cause célèbre. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 6:53 pm
As I recall, Jamie Love, representing Knowledge Ecology International, took the microphone and made an off-the-cuff statement and then a few more people followed, and that was that. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 11:53 am
As I recall, Jamie Love, representing Knowledge Ecology International, took the microphone and made an off-the-cuff statement and then a few more people followed, and that was that. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
Even when modernizing the law of comment (WIC Radio & Mair v Simpson [2008] 2 SCR 420) and creating a new “public interest responsible communication” defence (Grant v Torstar Corp [2009] SCC 61) the court failed to take the step of importing Charter analysis or standards into the common law[12] As to the English solution of Reynolds, Eady J comments sadly that the Reynolds defence “seems hardly ever to be used in litigation. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Summarizing the most interesting details from the collection would be a hopeless task, but I was particularly struck by two types of details. [read post]
