Search for: "In RE MARRIAGE OF HARRIS v. Harris" Results 101 - 120 of 129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm by Dan Ernst
Student Presenters: Jonathon Booth, Harvard University (jonathonbooth@g.harvard.edu)The Birth of Policing in Post-Emancipation JamaicaLauren Feldman, Johns Hopkins University (Lauren.feldman@jhu.edu)Constructing Legal Matrimony and the State in New York and the United States: Debating New York’s Marriage Act of 1827 and its EffectsJamie Grischkan, Boston University (jgrisch@bu.edu)Banking, Law, and American Liberalism: The Rise and Regulation of Bank Holding Companies in the Twentieth… [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Harris County Bail Bond Bd., No. 05-20714 A decision finding that a Texas statute restricting solicitation of potential customers denied bail bondsmen their First Amendment rights is affirmed in part and reversed in part where all but one of the restrictions violated the bondsmen's right to commercial speech. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 5:41 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
" wonders @ExtremeTech pjblack.me/x6czuC this is interesting: "Is Marriage Only For Rich People? [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am by Josh Blackman
"It's perfectly clear that nobody in 1868 thought that the 14th Amendment was going to protect the right to same-sex marriage," he says. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm by James Romoser
Once I got home and re-entered my own real world, the fact that I [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Apr. 21, 2009)Affirming dismissal of race/national origin/retaliation-discharge claims re 3 White Instrument Techs8th Circuit> Wallace v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 1:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A sizeable estate permits adequate compensation, but nothing beyond that (Martin v. [read post]