Search for: "In Re/In the Matter Of Mark A. Stewart" Results 101 - 120 of 149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2012, 11:47 am by Gina Durham
Other matters to explore include: Did a competitor apply for a “.industry” domain? [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:29 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
“Just because you’re an arrogant SOB or philanderer, that’s not the same as committing a crime. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am by Rob Robinson
Federal Court - bit.ly/IJr90K (Mark Hamblett) Peck Predictive Coding Opinion Upheld: Does Anyone Remember What This Case Is Actually About? [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 2:11 am by INFORRM
You know, we’re journalists so we stuck that in as a headline and it didn’t go down too well. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 5:41 pm by INFORRM
” Lord Justice Leveson replied: “I can only say to those who telephone your office and say ‘well we know what you’re like’, it’s far more nuanced than that. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 9:00 am by IMattson
While you might think you're stuck with Justice Potter Stewart's classic definition of obscenity ("I know it when I see it") when the examining attorneys make their decisions, a series of USPTO determinations has recently been collected that give you a more solid understanding of just what kinds of marks have been considered immoral, deceptive, or scandalous.Trademarks Laid Bare: Marks that May be Scandalous or Immoral (available in the… [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:54 am by The Editors
Stewart Levine makes the point nicely in Don’t Negotiate: Collaborate! [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
It is true, they are awarded to the one who has been made to suffer; but not as a matter of right. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 11:47 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Potter Stewart, though, gave us what's understood to be the basic rule. [read post]
25 May 2011, 10:37 am by Jay Shepherd
Like Potter Stewart and pornography, you know it when you see it. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 Obviously, if we’re calling California conservative and Idaho liberal, then the issues associated with comment k don’t fit well into the usual legal cubby holes.Idaho, then – holding our noses all the way. [read post]