Search for: "In Re: App for an Order v." Results 101 - 120 of 3,224
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2023, 5:47 am by Russell Knight
For unmarried parents, “[t]he court may order child support payments to be made for a period prior to the commencement of the action. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 8:02 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Knoll, 2016 IL App (1st) 152494, ¶ 50, 65 N.E.3d 878. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm by centerforartlaw
In certain instances, consignors may file UCC-1 notices to demonstrate their perfected interest in the consigned property in order to protect themselves from having their property included in the bankruptcy proceeding. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 9:00 am by Frank Santoro
App’x at 679, even after termination of the trust through final distribution, see, e.g., In re Hug’s Est., 107 N.Y.S.2d 664, 666 (N.Y. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:24 am by centerforartlaw
In this 1920s case, an art expert told a newspaper that a painting an owner claimed was La Belle Ferronnière was inauthentic, cratering its potential resale price, and a lawsuit was filed against the expert.[19] A more contemporary example is Thompson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:24 pm by centerforartlaw
In this 1920s case, an art expert told a newspaper that a painting an owner claimed was La Belle Ferronnière was inauthentic, cratering its potential resale price, and a lawsuit was filed against the expert.[19] A more contemporary example is Thompson v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:29 pm by Florian Mueller
At 6 PM Pacific Time on Tuesday, Google, approximately three dozen state attorneys-general, and consumer class-action lawyers filed a "stipulation and [proposed] order re deadlines in consumers' and states' actions in light of tentative settlement" in connection with the Google Play (Android app store) antitrust litigation in the Northern District of California that resulted from the procedural consolidation of multiple parallel actions. [read post]