Search for: "In Re: B.R.-2" Results 101 - 120 of 569
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2018, 12:59 pm by doug
Debtor counsel’s first line of defense to this aggression is former bankruptcy judge Henry Boroff’s opinion in In re Mollison, 463 B.R. 169 (Bankr.D.Mass. 2012). [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:41 am by Zuri Blackmon
   CLICK FOR FULL ARTICLE   My 2 cents: As a general rule we have little sympathy for debt collectors who conduct abusive collection activities. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Zuri Blackmon
  To be precise, the TBOR is fairly drafted and provides, at 2 sections:   “5. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 5:10 am by jameswilson29@gmail.com
  The court recognized that property settlement and equitable distribution debts were not priority debts and did not have to be paid in full, citing the case of In re Uzaldin, 418 B.R. 172 (Bkr. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 5:10 am by jameswilson29@gmail.com
  The court recognized that property settlement and equitable distribution debts were not priority debts and did not have to be paid in full, citing the case of In re Uzaldin, 418 B.R. 172 (Bkr. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:11 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Bank Court Cannot Hold a Municipal Court in Contempt In Re Perez 220 B.R. 216 (Bankr. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 5:42 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
  The Case Law: Geiger’s Progeny – In re Busch   The Court in In re Busch, 311 B.R. 657 (Bankr. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:24 am by jameswilson29@gmail.com
Welsch, 457 B.R. 748 (B.A.P. 8th Circuit, 2011), (In re: Mary Lumbar, Case No: 11-6018), the bankruptcy appellate panel for the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the “no harm, no foul” rule and held that the debtor ex-wife might have fraudulently transferred property to her parents, even though the property would have been exempt under state law. [read post]