Search for: "In Re: Beer"
Results 101 - 120
of 3,245
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2008, 6:37 pm
Carrying on the LexBlog tradition of 'Beer for Bloggers' when I'm traveling, we're having a meet up at 6 PM this Thursday evening in Chicago at Poag Mahone's at 333 S Wells St. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 10:57 am
Then he gave the participants, and all of us, and himself, a chance to re-evaluate our initial judgments on this incident. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 5:42 am
In re De Beers Intangibles Limited, Serial No. 79198047 (November 28, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 5:23 pm
At an average 150 calories per beer, even after drinking 100 beers, the four bears fell short at 15,000 calories. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 11:58 am
They’re re-paving the streets outside my house. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:47 pm
You’re all invited, blogger or not, lawyer or not, attending TechShow or not. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 11:55 am
You’re all invited, blogger or not, lawyer or not, attending TechShow or not. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 5:49 am
In re MetaBev LLC, Serial No. 90897101 (January 22, 2024) [Not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Melanye K. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 10:00 pm
A Kansas City re-packing company is expanding its beef jerky recall more than six-fold, adding two varieties of E3 Meat Co. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 4:29 am
In re Eagle Crest, Inc., 96 USPQ2d 1227, 1229 (TTAB 2010); In re Aerospace Optics, Inc., 78 USPQ2d 1861, 1862 (TTAB 2006). [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 11:05 am
ATL-L-5789-13), the plaintiff claimed that the beer he was served contained elements of a caustic and highly toxic chemical used to clean beer tap lines. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:36 am
In re Nittany Corporation, Serial No. 88439889 (March 17, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Elizabeth A. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:36 pm
” We’re getting together at 5 at Mason’s Restaurant Barre at 528 Hennepin Ave So (@ 6th St), downtown Minneapolis. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:36 am
As stated above, issue preclusion barred re-litigation of the first DuPont factor: the similarity of the marks. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 2:55 am
In re Marshall Brewing Company, LLC, Serial No. 87019347 (April 9, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 2:40 pm
See In re Iron Hill Brewery, LLC, Serial No. 86682532 (July 28, 2017). [read post]
17 May 2020, 6:19 pm
You’re in a bar petting a dog you don’t know, drinking draft beers, then you follow it up by putting your fingers in some big dirty marbles, wearing used shoes and using a public bathroom pic.twitter.com/qRMnV6rUSc— caitie delaney (@caitiedelaney) May 17, 2020 [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 4:29 pm
We're excited to see the transcript of that chat, if it's released. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 3:08 am
Examining Attorney Howard Smiga required disclaimer of the words FIRE ISLAND in Applicant's marks FIRE ISLAND BEER COMPANY LIGHTHOUSE ALE and the logo shown below, for "ale; beer," on the ground that the phrase is primarily geographically descriptive of the goods under Section 2(e)(2). [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 5:01 am
Merced, California is 80 miles from Yosemite National Park, but that was not far enough for Applicant Spirits of New Merced to avoid the Board's ruling that the mark YOSEMITE BEER is primarily geographically descriptive for alcoholic beer [BEER disclaimed]. [read post]
