Search for: "In Re: Mark Green v." Results 101 - 120 of 657
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2014, 7:31 am by Rebecca Jeschke
" Cohn has been involved with EFF for over 20 years, first working on Bernstein v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:03 am by John L. Welch
All Green Environment LLC, Opposition No. 91191751 [Opposition to registration of the design mark shown below left, for various clothing items and for online retail store services, on the grounds of likelihood of confusion with and likely dilution of the registered design mark shown below right, for online retail department store and retail department store services].August 14, 2012 - 10 AM: In re Nordic Naturals, Inc., Serial No. 77131419 [Refusal to register… [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:40 am
"), Phil Roberts (One Essex Court), Emily Greene (Warner Bros), Jasper Groot Koerkamp (AOMB IP Consultants, The Netherlands) and Sean Gilday (Page Hargrave). [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 12:34 am
  * My detergent product is green, but don't tell anyoneStarting from a nice story on Eco-friendly detergents, Neil reflect over the evolution of green-branded products and their public's perception. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 1:07 am
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & Macrae LLP Subscription Required U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
  And if you don’t know the topic well, you’re grateful to Mark for explaining it to you. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 5:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We wouldn’t get involved in the science, ex post v. ex ante and that sort of thing. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 2:34 am
Further to global warming (and Massachusetts v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 1:09 pm
Canadian Spaghnum Peat Moss Ass'n v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike’s Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds… [read post]