Search for: "In Re: Mark Green v."
Results 101 - 120
of 658
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2020, 1:25 am
Whilst both questions might now seem to have been overcome by the adoption of Article 17 of the DSM Directive, which received the green light from the Council exactly a year ago today [happy birthday! [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:13 pm
v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 4:26 am
" Wal-Mart, 529 U.S. at 212.Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 7:52 pm
” United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 7:37 am
It could re-invent blasphemy under the umbrella of the duty of care. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 1:38 pm
” (SABAM v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
See Mark Weisbrot’s November 8th article for The Nation. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 1:17 pm
Res. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 1:17 pm
Res. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:05 am
Word Mark 5897362 DOUBLE TIME 5897334 TRANSTAPE 5896926 WE SELL THE EARTH AND EVERYTHING ON IT! [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:05 am
November 21, 2019 - 1 PM: In re Medline Industries, Inc., Serial No. 87680078 [Section 2(d) refusal to register the color green (below left) as applied to gloves for “Medical examination gloves” in view of the registered mark shown below right, for the color green as applied to the exterior of gloves for use with “Gloves for medical use; Protective gloves for medical use"].Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog note: Any… [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:19 am
The appeal was suspended pending the Supreme Court's decision in Matal v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 7:18 am
One strike and you’re out. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 11:13 pm
Even if number 1 gets the green light, you usually fall at number 2. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
The first of these was a green paper introduced in 1973 by Allan MacEachen, President of the Privy Council. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
Patents In Nokia v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am
How we deal with the free rider being the TM owner—Packman v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 4:07 am
Green, 399 U.S. 149, 158 (1970) (noting that cross-examination is “the greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth” (internal quotation marks omitted)). [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]