Search for: "In Re: Order Amending Internal Operating Procedure Section 7.A of the Internal Operating Procedures of the Supreme Court" Results 101 - 120 of 146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Section 230 of the CDA (CDA 230) was not part of the original Communications Decency Act, which was designed to keep online smut away from kids, but it has been largely overturned under the First Amendment by the Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 8:22 am by William Ford
Supreme Court challenging the Commerce Department’s decision to include a citizenship question on the 2020 decennial census questionnaire. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Lev Sugarman
Supreme Court challenging the Commerce Department’s decision to include a citizenship question on the 2020 decennial census questionnaire. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:15 pm by Ritika Singh
Because our adversaries operate through the use of complex communications technologies, the National Security Agency, with its impressive capabilities and talented officers, is indispensable to keeping our country and our allies safe and secure. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
” Second, Chairman Schapiro provided for more rapid approval of formal orders of investigation authorizing the staff to issue subpoenas by permitting approval within a couple of days pursuant to the SEC’s “seriatim” or “duty officer” procedures. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
(Spicy IP) Jurisdiction and forum non conveniens – IP: St Ives Laboratories v Arif Perfumers (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) Extending fair use to academic works (International Law Office)   Israel Keter Sacrimental Articles successfully cancels Indigo Tabernacle Industries’ patent for religious garment (The IP Factor) Israel Commissioner of Patents issues circular regarding requesting allowance of Israel patent based on issuance abroad that is under challenge (The IP… [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
Aug. 7, 2008), as well as an earlier order in the Masterson case - Masterson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
In parallel with the DoH consultation on the revision of Required Standard Operating Procedures, (RSOPs), for independent clinics, other issues relevant to abortion have come into the public domain either as a result of internal action such as that by the Care Quality Commission or externally through media investigations. (21 January 2014). [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:00 pm by Guest Author Gary Arlen
  Will the famous decision “I know it when I see it” be applied to civil unrest as it was to obscenity in the Supreme Court 56 years ago? [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court entered an order dismissing the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted, based on settlement-related develo [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 10:27 am by Donald Clarke
In addition, obedience of officials to law is presented throughout as a kind of internal Party policy goal: this is something that Party members should do, and officials will even be scored on it (Section 7, Subsection 3). [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
McCollum, a New York State Supreme Court held that the corporation could not reimburse its directors even when they had in fact successfully defended against a shareholder derivative action.7   The idea that a corporation’s directors would be personally responsible for dollars spent defending them, even when they prevailed in court, was a wakeup call for many boardrooms. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
EPA.[46] As the Supreme Court observed, “[e]xtraordinary grants of regulatory authority are rarely accomplished through ‘modest words,’ ‘vague terms,’ or ‘subtle device[s]’” and that Congress does not “typically use oblique or elliptical language to empower an agency to make a ‘radical or fundamental change’ to a statutory sche [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 12:24 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
In the statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant replaced his requests with amended main and first and second auxiliary requests.IV. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Margaret Atwood on creativity (Michael Geist) National Graduate Caucus on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Supreme Court dismisses auto parts resellers' leave to appeal in action seeking expungement of trade marks for non-distinctiveness and abandonment: Hyundai Auto Canada v Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Ltd & Ors (Canadian Trademark Blog) 'Why copyright? [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm by centerforartlaw
However, at an increasing frequency in the early to mid-2000s, when the Gallery sold art pieces, it spent the sale proceeds on its own operating expenses even though the gallery had been required by Section 12.01 to keep those artist sale proceeds as “trust funds”. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am by Barry Sookman
In fact, in June 2005, Geist described the condition in Section 31.1(5) in Bill C-60 (a predecessor to Bill C-11 which eventually became law) using practically the same language as the wording in the Annex, and without making any reference to the order referred to having to be from a Canadian court: The bill also provides immunity against copyright infringement for ISPs for the content that they host (Section 31.1(4)). [read post]