Search for: "In Re: Watkins v."
Results 101 - 120
of 176
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2017, 11:16 pm
Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Tellabs v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(EDTexweblog.com) US Army – More DOA patents (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright – Decisions Reporting on 6th Circuit decision in Bridgeport Music v UMG Recordings concerning copyright in ‘Bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yea’ and accompanying musical elements (The 1709 Copyright Blog) (Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Freedom of Information Act suit for information on counterfeit seizures: Watkins v US Bureau of Customs… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(EDTexweblog.com) US Army - More DOA patents (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright - Decisions Reporting on 6th Circuit decision in Bridgeport Music v UMG Recordings concerning copyright in 'Bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yea' and accompanying musical elements (The 1709 Copyright Blog) (Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Freedom of Information Act suit for information on counterfeit seizures: Watkins v US Bureau of Customs and Border Protection… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(EDTexweblog.com) US Army - More DOA patents (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright - Decisions Reporting on 6th Circuit decision in Bridgeport Music v UMG Recordings concerning copyright in 'Bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yea' and accompanying musical elements (The 1709 Copyright Blog) (Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Freedom of Information Act suit for information on counterfeit seizures: Watkins v US Bureau of Customs and Border Protection… [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 10:36 am
Dunn, Beth Watkins, for Trudy Jane Schuetze Sundin. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 7:00 am
See City of New York v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:00 am
I will be adding it to my list of law-related movies that I will shortly be re-publishing on a new website (the launch of which I will announce on SLAW). [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:04 am
Watkins decision in 1961. [read post]
Don’t Judge a Range by its Cover: Federal Circuit Sides with Patentee on Written Description Support
11 Feb 2024, 9:43 am
The decision attempted to distinguish In re Baird, 348 F.2d 974 (C.C.P.A. 1965), and Indivior UK Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Holt v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 10:03 pm
Detective M indicated that the appellant would first have to be re-advised of his Miranda rights. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Greg Watkins v. [read post]
18 Nov 2017, 7:46 am
This initiative was proposed by the head of the Defense Committee of the Upper House of the Russian Parliament, Víktor Bóndarev, and the head of the Committee for the Defense of the Duma in the Lower Chamber, Vladimir Shamánov. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
In Luttrell v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 10:00 am
It simply never analyzes the limitation on the injunctive relief available under the federal claim.Eventually, it will be interesting to see if Illinois courts re-evaluate the inevitable disclosure doctrine. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:09 am
” Blisset v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
Despite some initial scepticism about the need or utility for reliance upon notions of common law constitutionalism in a post HRA/post EU Charter era (see for example Watkins v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 5:37 am
Bar Assoc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 11:55 pm
Garre, now chair of the appellate practice at Latham & Watkins, testified about the case at a Dec. 2 hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
