Search for: "In Re Application to Change Name"
Results 101 - 120
of 5,186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2023, 7:09 pm
I have used this basis before to attack applications in which the applicant clearly printed a fake label or photoshopped its name onto an existing product. [read post]
26 May 2021, 11:45 am
Migration and Environmental Change in Morocco: In Search for Linkages Between Migration Aspirations and (Perceived) Environmental Changes (Springer, 2021) [open access]- "This open access book studies the migration aspirations and trajectories of people living in two regions in Morocco that are highly affected by environmental change or emigration, namely Tangier and Tinghir, as well as the migration trajectories of immigrants coming from these regions… [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 12:32 am
Thus, there had been an error and not a change of mind. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:48 pm
Professional Confirmation of Little or no Risk of Future Sex Crime Conduct (Re-Offenses) 5. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
Application volume (as distinct from number of discrete applicants) is also up, by an even larger amount in most places. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 3:50 pm
This application was still pending in 2010 when the law changed. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:03 pm
The Commission recommended changes that were ultimately adopted in 1974. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
" Applicant, however, argued that HONEYSUCKLE ROSE has a "cultural significance as evidenced by the numerous businesses that have appropriated this mark for their business names. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 1:28 pm
If the changes are approved as expected, a spokesperson for ICANN said that the organization would begin accepting applications for non-English domain names very soon, and the first entries of the new URLs would probably be implemented sometime in mid-2010. [read post]
Precedential No. 40: TTAB Refuses to Allow Witness to Change Testimony in HOLLYWOOD HOTEL Opposition
22 Dec 2015, 4:40 am
" Allowing a re-opening of the deposition would likely result only in the witness hewing to the amended answers. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 2:45 am
Patenting them darned pesky names again ...The IPKat thinks that dazzling CNBC business news journalist Maria "Money Honey" Bartiromo should consider changing her lawyers, or at least let them into the secret of trade mark registration: they're advising her to patent her nickname, if the report in today's Telegraph is anything to go by.Right: Ms Bartiromo, still smiling (presumably this shot was taken before she encountered the patent system ...)Merpel… [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
See In re Pro-Line Corp., 28 USPQ2d 1141 (TTAB 1993) (BLACKER THE COLLEGE SWEETER THE KNOWLEDGE primarily ornamental slogan that is not likely to be perceived as source indicator); In re Dimitri’s Inc., 9 USPQ2d 1666 (TTAB 1988) (SUMO, as used in connection with stylized representations of sumo wrestlers on applicant’s T-shirts and baseball-style caps, serves merely as an ornamental feature of applicant’s goods); In re Original Red Plate… [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 9:32 am
In order to re-patent the subsequently filed identical application would need to be re-filed prior to the publication or patent issuing so that the publication/patent of the first filed application will not be prior art under 102(a). [read post]
31 May 2024, 12:02 pm
The typeface of the verbal elements was found to be of 'no consequence' as they are not capable of changing the consumer's understanding of the Mark. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:50 pm
Software and hardware companies will never be able to convincingly claim that they are being honest about what their applications and tools are doing, and users will have no good reason to believe them if they try. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 12:16 am
Why does the own name defence matter? [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 7:05 am
Harriman’s name on Applicant’s website and that consumers hence are likely to view HARRIMAN, as it appears in Applicant’s proposed mark, as a surname. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 10:06 pm
Nor the impending failure of PubPat's appeal of the inter partes re-exam loss.See alsoPubPat, FTCR lose in inter partes re-exam of WARF stem cell patent "Consumer Watchdog" gets it wrong, again FTCR changes its name after stem cell defeat ***OtherwiseSimpson has been dogging some of the secretive practices of CIRM. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 11:30 am
Listing the first applicant is a useful indicator that you’re looking at the correct document. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:22 pm
" GoPets filed an application to register the "GoPets" mark in 2004 and the registration issued in 2006. [read post]
