Search for: "In Re Chrysler Corp" Results 101 - 120 of 149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Chrysler Corp., 32 F.3d 1541, 1551 (Fed. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
Pa. 2003) passim In re Ormet Corp., 324 B.R. 645 (Bankr. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 4:28 am
———– The case of In re Chrysler LLC, Debtor has the potential to produce the most significant Supreme Court ruling on the government’s power to deal with economic crisis since the Court struck down major parts of President Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal, in Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:43 pm
  The case in the Circuit Court is In re Chrysler (Circuit docket 09-2311). [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:28 am
Bloomberg News reports, "Plaintiffs in personal-injury and product-liability lawsuits against Chrysler LLC and General Motors Corp. are pressing members of Congress to ensure that their cases will be heard in court or an alternate form of compensation is found. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 12:05 am
See, e.g., In re White Motor Credit Corp., 75 B.R. 944, 949 (Bankr. [read post]
27 May 2009, 9:47 am
Time to re-read In re SPM Mfg Corp, 984 F2d 1305 (1st Cir. 1993) and the rules about "gift plans" again. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:20 pm
(In re Lionel Corp.), 722 F.2d 1063, 1071 (2d Cir.1983).Motorola, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 8:25 am
In all the hubbub about Souter’s retirement, the Chrysler bankruptcy, the Mark Levy tragedy, we’re running the risk of letting some good news stories pass us by. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 5:46 pm
Buckeye Chrysler-Jeep-Dodge of Shelby, 2008 WL 2789074, No. 2007-CA-0121 (Ohio. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 3:04 am
Daimler Chrysler Corp. and Khulumani v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
(IP Watchdog) Legal studies program suspended (just_n_examiner) Books as prior art (just_n_examiner) Northern District of Illinois continues as top IP court – Administrative Office of the US Courts 2008 Annual Report (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Re-exam delays cause trouble for patent owners (Law360) Recovering pate [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
The court threw out a lot of claims but not all of them.We're going to go through Guinan I first, but quickly (yeah, right, we know you guys), because it's necessary to understand Guinan II - the one we're most interested in.The remaining claims in Guinan I were malpractice (medical negligence), informed consent, fraud/misrepresentation, and medical monitoring.The first question was choice of law. [read post]