Search for: "In Re Federal Coal Company" Results 101 - 120 of 416
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2016, 8:53 pm by Matthew D. Kaplan
In addition, the radio network reports, “railroad companies have also argued federal law trumps local regulation anyway. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 8:54 am by WIMS
<> Coal-Tar-Sealant Runoff Causes Toxicity and DNA Damage - Runoff from pavement with coal-tar-based sealant is toxic to aquatic life, damages DNA, and impairs DNA repair, according to two studies by the U.S. [read post]
12 May 2015, 9:00 am by WIMS
Federal Register Highlights  The following is an alert of Environmental Federal Register announcements that may be of interest. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 7:10 am by Adam Schwartz
So this bill was like (in the words of our friend Jake Snow at ACLU) a coal mining exception from environmental protection laws. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:17 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> In Re: Deepwater Horizon - 6/4/14. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 12:09 am by John Steele
Here's an interesting new case from the Supreme Court of Oklahoma: In re Application for Reinstatement of Stewart. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 8:54 am by Lovechilde
Earlier this year, President Obama signed off on the project, opening a huge chunk of federal land to coal mining. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 7:04 am by Theo Francis
 Or perhaps they’re there because Newmont Mining (NEM) has nervous lawyers — or wants to make a point about congressional meddling. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 10:58 am
Two private buyout firms seeking to acquire TXU have told environmental groups that they would scale back the utility company's plans to build 11 new coal-fired plants to three such plants. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:50 pm by Legal Momma
I don't know if you've noticed, but they're doing just fine on their own. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
IN THE NEWS The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) withdrew a proposed rule requiring all railroad and trucking companies to test drivers for sleep apnea. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 11:38 am
"And then there's the federal government….. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 10:01 pm by Cookson Beecher
But care needs to be taken so the coals don’t flare up and touch the meat and that the equipment you’re using isn’t made of galvanized metal, which can exude toxic fumes. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:56 pm by David Wagner
And companies that choose to re-fracture wells using the pollution-reducing equipment prior to the January 2015 deadline would not be covered by the NSPS. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:04 am by Theo Francis
Cablevision aside, these tend to be dull affairs: Uncontested incumbents are re-elected, vague executive incentive plans are adopted, auditors are rehired, and shareholder proposals are shot down — from greenhouse gas emissions at coal company Massey Energy (MEE) to bird welfare at BJ’s Wholesale Club (BJ). [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced its intent to strengthen rules governing the wastewater discharge from coal-fired power plants. [read post]