Search for: "In Re Gorsuch"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,067
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2023, 11:54 am
[This is a long read, but very important for FOIA litigators!] [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Although it was a unanimous judgment, Alito was joined by just four other Justices (Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Jackson). [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
Justice Gorsuch wrote the majority opinion in McGirt v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
We’re not sitting on different sides at oral argument, so to speak, on the bench. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
" Morever, Justice Gorsuch continued in his majority opinion: "Before us, no party challenges these conclusions. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Writing for the majority, Justice Gorsuch argued that “the First Amendment envisions the United States as a rich and complex place where all persons are free to think and speak as they wish, not as the government demands. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 1:20 pm
Justice Gorsuch has very clear priorities with regard to Indian law and the administrative state. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:09 pm
(Justice Gorsuch is almost certainly correct this statement from Gratz is in error.) [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:14 am
Gorsuch's Revenge? [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:11 am
I read Justice Gorsuch's decision as broader in some respects than some may hope it is. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a short statement that was joined by Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
The majority of the Court — judging from the main opinion (by Chief Justice Roberts) and the Gorsuch concurrence — says "critical mass" as if it's practically nonsense, and the dissenters avoid it — perhaps because as long as they've lost, they have something else they'd prefer to say about the reason for supporting affirmative action. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 8:31 am
Pp. 39–40.The decision must be somewhat moderate, I'm inferring, because there are concurring opinions from Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:25 pm
Kempster (§ 1983 Claim; Tribal Authority) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2023.html In re Manuel C. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:32 am
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. re-opens the door to suing foreign companies in U.S. courts over disputes that arise in other countries. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 8:31 am
Its famous alumni include Oprah Winfrey, and Supreme Court justices Neil Gorsuch and Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:45 am
In re R. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
On the other hand, Kagan also declined to take up the suggestion made by Justice Sotomayor in her concurrence (joined by Justice Gorsuch) that the government be required to establish that the defendant specifically intended to communicate a threat. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:36 am
Justice Gorsuch says no. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Also, Justice Gorsuch wrote a concurring opinion (joined by Justices Thomas and Barrett) which said that “it is not entirely clear where the Rogers test comes from,” “it is not obvious that Rogers is correct in all its particulars,” and “serious questions” were raised about the test. [read post]
