Search for: "In Re Grand Jury Subpoena of [Witness]" Results 101 - 120 of 202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2015, 12:14 pm by Jason Weiner
They might ensue as you make a deposition, testify under oath or appear before a grand jury. [read post]
The ABA’s paragraph (e) regarding limitations on subpoenaing lawyers to grand juries or other legal proceedings is viewed as unnecessary, as there are adequate safeguards in place for federal prosecutors, and the Utah criminal justice system does not typically use the grand jury procedure. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 8:39 am by Ken White
So, for instance, a criminal defendant can testify before the grand jury or at a preliminary hearing but refuse to testify at trial. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:47 am by W. Neil Eggleston
Cipollone is an especially key witness in one of the most important investigations ever undertaken by the Congress. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  If we indulge the assumption that the investigation is tied to some grand jury inquiry (likely in most, though not all scenarios) then resistance to a valid subpoena is quite hard. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
Nichols was captured without incident the next day, and shortly thereafter the Fulton County grand jury indicted him on 54 counts of felony murder, kidnapping, armed robbery, and a host of other charges. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:05 am by admin
On the other hand, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit sitting in Atlanta held yesterday in In re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated March 25, 2011 that forcing a suspect to decrypt a computer or produce a decrypted version of the files on the computer is testimonial, and therefore does trigger Fifth Amendment protection. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 2:39 pm by Robbie Kenney
(SenateNJ.com) A half year later, Massachusetts has completed an inquiry into the problems that led to tragedy, and a grand jury has indicted several top officials from a particularly hard-hit veterans facilities. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:10 pm by andrew
But as we pointed out, that’s inconsistent with case law that says, for instance, that witnesses at grand jury proceedings—which are historically both secret and subject to court oversight—cannot be indefinitely gagged from talking about their own testimony. [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:23 am by Ken White
They had already put witnesses before the grand jury, they had already used grand jury subpoenas to get Hastert's bank records, they already knew exactly how they would charge and prove up the structuring charge. [read post]
3 May 2018, 11:23 am by Cullie Burris
Information subpoenaed by the grand jury requires disclosure. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:25 am by Susan Brenner
In July of 2003, a Scioto (Ohio) County grand jury indicted John Adams on “one count of murder, one count of aggravated burglary, and three counts of kidnapping. [read post]
Perhaps, for example, the department has been aggressively investigating all along, and its activity only recently became visible because of questioning before the grand jury. [read post]
26 May 2010, 4:56 am by Susan Brenner
See In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Oct. 29, 1992, 1 F.3d 93 (`production may not be refused [i]f the government can demonstrate with reasonable particularity that it knows of the existence and location of subpoenaed documents’). . . . [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 12:48 pm by Ken
Therefore, typical federal investigations — especially white collar and complex ones — can take years, and can involve slowly flipping one witness against the next, bringing witness after witness before the grand jury to lock them in, sending subpoena after subpoena to third parties, until the prosecutors build their case. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
Only then is a person compelled to be a “witness” against himself. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:14 pm
True, there’s some language in the caselaw questioning whether Congress could authorize warrants to be executed abroad, but they’re unexplained and strike me as unpersuasive, as apparently they struck the relevant legal actors in amending Rule 41 to allow extraterritorial warrants. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:20 pm by Steve Lubet
As recently reported by The Washington Post,[1] an extensive new grand jury subpoena has been served on a number of Trump's associates, seeking two dozen categories of information, some of which has not previously been requested. [read post]