Search for: "In Re Initial Public Offering Antitrust Litigation"
Results 101 - 120
of 161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2009, 5:14 pm
The volume of commentary following my publication earlier this week of "The Great De-Leveraging" has been unprecedented. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:52 am
For example, I did antitrust litigation and then I pivoted and learned all about construction litigation. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
The potential losses come from the removal of public policies that directly and indirectly commit public funds to inflating the price of houses. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 8:25 am
The litigants directly compete. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:49 am
Not worth it to them to litigate. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
” In re Initial Public Offerings Securities Litigation, 471 F.3d 24, 45 (2d Cir. 2006). [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
The securities class action – initially filed in December 2019 – survived a motion to dismiss in April 2021. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 3:51 pm
ASCAP and BMI are overseen by courts through an antitrust consent decree dating back to 1941. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
Newport Fishing * IP/Internet/Antitrust Professor Amicus Brief in 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am
Luxy * Fifth Circuit Says Keyword Ads Could Contribute to Initial Interest Confusion (UGH)–Adler [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
This development quickly caught the eye of litigation reform advocates, as the adoption of fee-shifting bylaws seemed to offer a way for companies to reduce the costs of and possibly curb burdensome litigation. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 1:53 am
In addition, most of the antitrust litigation filed to date has named only corporate defendants. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm
Global Initiative for Asthma, Inc. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:29 am
Peter Schlosser: ”The Abolition of Exequatur Proceedings – Including Public Policy Review? [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
Pontifical Catholic University Services Ass’n, 357 F.3d 1, 3 (1st Cir. 2004) (dismissing suit as “not a plausible antitrust case”); Farm Credit Services v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:25 pm
The Department also is asking for public comment on the Proposal’s language for periodic review to update the salary threshold. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 2:50 pm
On June 30, 2021, the governing bodies of the NCAA passed a policy that suspended all NCAA NIL rules for incoming and current students.[23] In short, this suspension meant that NCAA athletes, for the first time, would have the opportunity to financially benefit from their NIL effective July 1, 2021.[24] The NCAA offered the following guidance to its athletes and its member institutions: Individuals can engage in NIL activities that are consistent with the law of the state where the school… [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
International),Transforming intellectual property in China and Taiwan: (Thomson Scientific)Service of Process in China: (IPDragon), EuropeMontenegro gets the long list treatment: (IPKat),First must-fit design invalidity decision: (Catch us if you can),Crocs refused European community design due to ‘lack [of] individual character': (IP Factor),Online content and patent reform are key for Europe in… [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
Therefore, it seems very likely that 1-800 Contacts already refused a settlement offer from the FTC. [read post]
