Search for: "In Re Medical Review Panel"
Results 101 - 120
of 893
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2012, 1:48 pm
Advanced Medical Optics, 659 F.3d 835 (9th Cir. 2011). [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:09 am
None of these physicians had any clue about workers' compensation regulation of their professional activity.No wonder Utilization Review and Independent Medical Review are such road blocks - the physicians that are supposed to be complying with various standards don't even know a) that there are standards, or b) how to comply.Ugh! [read post]
18 May 2011, 6:21 am
A medical review panel unanimously found that the doctors did not breach the standard of care due to t he complicated nature of the case. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:16 am
At that point, the claims administrator has 10 days to send a copy of all the worker's medical records in its possession that are "relevant" to:The worker's current medical condition.The medical treatment provided by the employer.The disputed medical treatment requested by the worker.The claims handler must also send a copy of all information sent to the worker explaining the decision regarding the disputed treatment, all materials the injured… [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 3:55 pm
Supreme Court agreed (.pdf) today to review the panel’s finding that overcrowding in California’s prisons is the primary reason behind unconstitutional levels of inmate medical care. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:11 am
Do kids understand what they’re doing? [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:09 am
Don't make the mistake of believing that punishment will help anything.' "
"The panel's findings were based on a review of six studies that examined the effect of juvenile transfers to the adult system. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:25 am
"California Dreamin'" is the theme of this year's event, and it seems like an appropriate motif, particularly in light of the state of Utilization Review and it's red headed step child, Independent Medical Review. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 1:30 pm
By April 2016 there was a sufficient federal court Viagra lawsuits filed that the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) decided to create the so-called Viagra MDL, known fully as IN RE: VIAGRA (SILDENAFIL CITRATE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION -- MDL No. 2691. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:31 am
The group argued that it was time for both officials and the court to re-examine the evidence - which overwhelmingly falls in favor of the medicine. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:45 pm
” At this point we’re veering off into constitutional metaphysics: The panel has invented a non-existent test, and it then confronts the puzzle of who gets to apply the non-existent test it has just imagined. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 4:42 pm
Please send medical assistance. [read post]
8 May 2018, 11:11 am
In re Zurn Pex Plumbing Prods. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 3:33 am
First, the panel said that therapeutic speech is non-speech conduct and so protected only by rational basis review. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:10 pm
Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are used as antidepressants and antianxiety medications. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:10 pm
Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are used as antidepressants and antianxiety medications. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 11:50 am
According to the registration bait:"Using systematic reviewing techniques drawn from the medical sciences, a team of behavioural economists and psychologists from the University of East Anglia has undertaken a scoping review of all evidence published between 2003-2013 into the welfare implications and determinants of unlawful file sharing. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:25 am
 This local article from Arizona, which is headlined "House panel reviews cost of sentencing," reports on the terms of the debate that is now quite familiar to serious students of state criminal justice systems: Arizona's state budget problems are prompting lawmakers to take a new look at how the state does business. [read post]
8 May 2007, 2:47 am
Owens (whose husband Ed is now executive director of the Texas Youth Commission) proposing the change of her own accord.Another proposed rule change removes the requirement that new information be present to request a special review including medical reviews, and also includes language which puzzles me as to its significance:When the special review panel decides the offender's case warrants a special review, the case shall be… [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 4:58 pm
Last May, a three-judge panel of the court declared the law unconstitutional. [read post]
