Search for: "In Re Standing Order With Reasons Regarding Objections"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
There's no malice if you act in an (1) honest, and (2) reasonable mistake of fact regarding self-defense. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
It almost makes you think that they're not sincerely concerned about hospitals being overwhelmed.Comstock ActOn the merits, much of Judge Kacsmaryk's reasoning rests on the supposition that FDA could not approve mifepristone for mail-order prescription because sending mifepristone via the mail or other courier violates a provision first enacted as part of the (notorious) Comstock Act of 1873. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
" The course originally had a quite modest objective--to introduce law students to legal research and reasoning through case law, statutory interpretation, and legal history, processes, and institutions. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Order, supra, ¶ 13). [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:08 am
With regard to the Objectors, she obtained confirmation from Mr William Nye, Secretary General of the Archbishops’ Council that the Revd Dr Ian Paul was not “acting as a representative of the Archbishop’s Council or with their knowledge”; and was “not persuaded to set aside or vary the Deputy Chancellor’s order on [his] standing”. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 1:08 pm
The majority’s holding deprives the Rule of Two mandate of its force and effect, it impedes congressional objectives regarding set asides, and it renders 8127(d) inoperative and unnecessary. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 12:38 am
A number of possibilities were evaluated [2], but found to be unsuitable; the Chancellor was persuaded on the evidence before her that those conclusions were reasonable. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:11 am
The civil division granted Amy’s motion in part, reasoning that “appellants had failed to make a timely objection challenging either issue and that the issue of whether the will was conditional represented a collateral attack on the probate division’s final order. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 12:44 pm
Judge Pohl seems to buy some of what Ryan is selling, and asks a follow-up question regarding whether the prosecution is prepared to state what it would consider good cause without actually knowing Bin Attash’s reasoning. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 12:46 pm
(I wrote about the confusion regarding this appellate process last month.)The Supreme Court did not elaborate or give reasons for its 8-0 ruling. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
The district court granted the motion to compel, holding that (1) all of the Green Tree Parties had standing to compel arbitration even though some were not signatories to the arbitration agreement; and (2) the parties had agreed to delegate questions regarding arbitrability to the arbitrator. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:04 am
See In re Rules & Regulations Implementing the Tel. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 10:24 am
But for two reasons I kept plowing on with the work on Goldsmith's book and his views. [read post]
CJEU rules on seeding, trolls, and interplay between copyright enforcement and data protection rules
20 Jun 2021, 5:47 am
As AG Szpunar reasoned by analogy with the functioning of the World Wide Web (at [49]), The work as an object that is perceptible to humans exists on the web only from the point at which a client computer accesses the server in question, reproduces the file and displays that work on the screen (or reproduces its sounds). [read post]
11 May 2014, 4:29 am
No objection at trial, so we’re in plain-error territory. [read post]
29 May 2020, 9:04 am
Because of that, I’m not sure who would have standing to sue. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
An attempt to vindicate someone else’s rights is generally forbidden under the so-called third-party-standing doctrine.In Whole Woman’s Health, Justice Thomas objected to the fact that doctors, rather than women seeking abortions, were suing to block the Texas law. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:00 am
Not so fast, the Appellate Division said last week in reversing the order of dissolution. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 6:58 pm
That is, the judge should measure the reasonableness of an attorney’s conduct based on objective criteria, as opposed to an attorney’s “internal belief”. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:23 am
We are here making our case and standing on the law. [read post]
