Search for: "In The Matter Of: L.R"
Results 101 - 114
of 114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
L.R. (6th) 26, rev’d on other grounds 2018 SCC 21, [2018] 1 S.C.R. 633, but disagreed on their application. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 11:08 pm
Bakshi Inderjeet Singh, (2005) 1 SCC 598; Manicka Poosali (Deceased by L.Rs.) [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm
Ms F obtained an injunction for the leaseholders’ re-entry in November and this matter went to trial. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm
Ms F obtained an injunction for the leaseholders’ re-entry in November and this matter went to trial. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm
Incorporation by reference in building contracts By Thomas G. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm
”8 (2) Second, the client is necessarily he to whom allegiance is owed in tax matters. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 4:01 am
One Sunday each month we bring you a summary from Supreme Advocacy LLP of recent decisions at the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Fletcher (1866), L.R. 1 Ex. 265, aff’d (1868), L.R. 3 H.L. 330 for that loss. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:47 pm
Last week we invited Cathy Gellis to guest-post her observations of a hearing in AF Holdings v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 12:43 pm
The hearing involving Prenda Law that I described in the previous post soon resulted in a ruling, which I again summarized on Popehat. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
It has provided virtually no guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on the degree of statutory specificity necessary to provide agency authority over a major question . . . . [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm
The matter was ‘resolved’ by the Marriage Act 1836 which introduced what we now call “civil weddings”. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Kirk Baert has kindly permitted us to post his Application to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
