Search for: "In The Matter Of: N.A" Results 101 - 120 of 600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2013, 8:35 am by Ronald Mann
BankChampaign, N.A. is a case in which the oral argument had little to do with the final opinion. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:34 pm
Chase Bank USA, N.A., Chase bank gave plaintiff Barbee Lyon incorrect information about the basis for a $645 charge on his credit card bill. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm by Wolfgang Demino
GETTING THE FACTS WRONG AB INITIO By way of first salvo, the Curious authors get the facts wrong about the case, and not exactly on a nontrivial matter. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A., --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 3804370 (9th Cir.) [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 2:15 pm by Sherin and Lodgen
As a general matter, insured deposit accounts, including checking, interest bearing savings, and money market accounts are insured by the FDIC in the aggregate up to $250,000, per depositor, for each insured bank, for each legal “ownership category”. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 2:15 pm by ngritacco
As a general matter, insured deposit accounts, including checking, interest bearing savings, and money market accounts are insured by the FDIC in the aggregate up to $250,000, per depositor, for each insured bank, for each legal “ownership category”. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:22 am by Big Tent Democrat
The lawsuit names JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as well as Virginia-based MERSCORP, Inc. and its subsidiary, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 7:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2010 WL 3155934 (N.D. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:24 am by John Diekman
A motion for reargument must be based upon matters of fact or law allegedly overlooked or misapprehended by the court in determining the prior motion, but shall not include any matters of fact not offered on the prior motion, pursuant to CPLR 2221[d][2]). [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 8:22 pm
  The Court then analyzed whether the Charges were subject to arbitration by first determining whether the parties had voluntarily agreed to arbitration, and then what subject matter the parties agreed was subject to the arbitration provision. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
However, “a waiver of sovereign immunity cannot, on its own, extend a court’s subject matter jurisdiction” (Oneida Indian Nation v Phillips, 981 F3d at 171), and “[w]aivers of [sovereignty] are to be strictly construed in favor of the Tribe” (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Chukchansi Economic Dev. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:17 pm
In a nutshell, this happened to borrower Kwang Sheen with his lender Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. [read post]