Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 101 - 120 of 18,237
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2024, 1:43 pm
Yep, it's four times more likely that they're correlated. [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:47 pm by Josh Blackman
It is rare that we have a Justice's opinion on how to interpret pronouns on protest signs, but we have Snyder v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:42 am by Giles Peaker
Section 23 does not refer to a requirement to provide accommodation under Part VI of the Act for the straightforward reason that there is, as Lord Justice Bean explains, no such requirement. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
On 24 May 2024 judgment on meaning was handed down by HHJ Lewis in Unity Plus Healthcare Ltd v Clay & Ors (Re Preliminary Issues) [2024] EWHC 1278 (KB). [read post]
28 May 2024, 10:03 am by Michael C. Dorf
Those displays were, of course, infuriating, but the two-step I have in mind appears in two of Justice Alito's majority opinions: Dobbs v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
If you think of a BC Provincial Court judicial justice as a person without legal training who decides cases of little importance, you’re out of date. [read post]
27 May 2024, 3:30 am by Rebecca Zietlow
The Dobbs ruling forces advocates for reproductive rights to re-theorize constitutional claims for rights and provides an opportunity for a widespread campaign for reproductive justice. [read post]
25 May 2024, 11:12 pm by Frank Cranmer
In other news…  General Election 2024 So they’re off! [read post]
This term stated that customers must “tell us if anything changes while you’re insured with us” (the Notification Clause) (our emphasis) and was included within Product Disclosure Statements (PDSs) issued with approximately 1,377,900 contracts for home and contents insurance policies. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am by Tom Dannenbaum
(Editor’s Note: This article is part of our new symposium on the ICC and Israel-Hamas war.) [read post]