Search for: "In re: Wells, et al" Results 101 - 120 of 2,314
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2019, 11:34 pm by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm scored some points, but probably not enough (quantitatively and qualitatively speaking) to prevent the FTC from prevailing on at least one or two key claims (we're all still waiting for Judge Lucy H. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:18 pm
And here's where it gets .... interesting:The theory behind the suit is that, since Justice Roberts (et al) deemed the Mandate 'kosher' as a funding mechanism, and since  the  Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 explicitly set that funding at $0, the entire platform on which ObamaCare was built is null-and-void.Whoa there, Henry, went a little fast there, didn't you? [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 11:18 am by admin
., et al., (March 20, 2020, United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 19-CV-2638), the Court, by Judge Nicholas G. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 2:51 pm
And since an overwhelming majority of Americans are dead-set against ObamaCare, it seems to me that OFA (et al) would do well to remember that old adage about flies and honey. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 4:55 pm by Mike
 Had blogs not forced their hands, Reuters et al. would have gladly kow-towed to their rich friends.We now know who are real enemies are...Or at least we're starting to see. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 2:06 pm
"Turns out, after the DOI investigated some 500 claims, it determined that Time, et al neglected their duties under the Constitution State's prompt pay laws, and had an inordinate number of pre-ex denials turned away on appeal. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In passing it is argued that these rules and tasks were well-known, for example from the “activity of a librarian registering incoming and outgoing books of the library”. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:41 am by Hull and Hull LLP
Specifically, they refer to the case Ekelshot-Kumelj, et al v. [read post]