Search for: "In re: Wells, et al"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,322
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2023, 12:02 pm
Choose a friend who is willing to send their clients or subscribers a copy of YOUR report (et al.). [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 8:07 am
Lambert et al., the young man was driving home from dinner when he struck a motorcyclist, who is the plaintiff in this case. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:55 am
Moreover, OpenAI’s sudden firing and re-hiring of Sam Altman is a cause for concern. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:22 am
All she was doing was following the law (it’s treaty rights after all) but the vicious anti-Indian onslaught of Rehnquist, Scalia, Kennedy, et al must have made her pause in a couple ways. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 7:55 am
I am deighted to pass along the announcement of the publication of (Anne Wagner and Sarah Marusek (eds)) Research Handbook on Legal Semiotics (Edward Elgar, 2023). [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
The Bankruptcy Court denied PIFSS’ motion to dismiss, ruling that the trustee’s claim fell within the “commercial activity” exception to sovereignimmunity: (a) foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case … (2) in which the action is based … upon an act outside the territory of the United States in connection with a commercial activity of the foreign state elsewhere and that act causes a… [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:41 pm
[3] Boore AL, et al. (2015). [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
Chubin et al. at 10, Daubert v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:33 pm
Burgum, et al. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:06 am
Persons with severe diarrhea often require re-hydration, usually with intravenous (IV) fluids. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 10:05 am
Yet it is especially relevant that this was a moment when Gottheimer et al.'s neo-triangulating nonsense was put to the test, and their answer was that they were still Democrats. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:30 pm
& Leila Barraza et al., Supreme Court Impacts in Public Health Law: 2022-2023, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics (forthcoming 2023) In another tumultuous term of the United States Supreme Court in 2022-2023 a series of cr [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 10:18 am
(Removing the "re" from "redistribution" so that we don't have an implicit baseline such as pretax income.) [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 8:40 am
Yerba Buena Neighborhood Consortium, LLC, et al v. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 11:58 pm
Quick links Stephanie Biden et al, Bates Wells: Faith-based Organisations 2023 Update: a helpful overview – especially the roundup of cases. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: Singh et. al. v Braich, 2023 ONSC 5053 [1] This motion is about an examination for discovery gone wrong. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 12:59 pm
Et in unum Dominum. . . . [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
The order to dismiss the Qualcomm class action(s) came one day after Judge Corley also made a decision (in a class-action matter that does not involve Qualcomm but also followed an FTC action) relating in part to yours truly's communications with Microsoft: DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
Note that the petition that the panel just granted was filed by the challengers (Missouri et al.), and argues that the panel erred in finding no First Amendment violation by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the State Department's Global Engagement Center. [* * *] In yesterday's decision in Missouri v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
We offer two articles on that new topic as well. [read post]
