Search for: "In re Answers Corporation Shareholder Litigation"
Results 101 - 120
of 290
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2017, 3:31 am
Obviously I can’t answer that question as it pertains to Lund or any other case in which I’ve had no involvement. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:31 am
Obviously I can’t answer that question as it pertains to Lund or any other case in which I’ve had no involvement. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 8:39 am
The answer was the growth of societal structures (markets) providing extra legal enforcement--a lex mercatoria for sovereign debt? [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 3:14 am
The article uses social science and expansive notions of contractual relations in advocating for courts to give greater weight to what he calls “family values” in adjudicating corporate dissolution and other disputes among shareholder-members of the same family. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 4:02 am
Enforcement had not sought a re-application requirement to follow the period of suspension. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:12 am
And when you have corporations that have hugely vested interests in maintaining high incarceration rates in order to serve their shareholders—and these are publicly traded organizations, they're bought and sold on the stock market—that creates a perverse incentive. [read post]
21 May 2016, 2:34 pm
Our firm has also handled many shareholder and LLC disputes between owners of closely held corporations, and LLCs. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm
The answer at this stage is unclear, as these manuscript products are largely untested in the courts. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 6:26 am
That’s unfortunate, because the Google shareholders (including Google shareholders in Mississippi) could well have benefited from some of the answers that General Hood was trying to extract from Google about Google’s failures to comply with the NPA. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 10:37 am
In ATP Tour, the high court answered questions of law certified to it from the U.S. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 10:37 am
In ATP Tour, the high court answered questions of law certified to it from the U.S. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
This past year was an eventful one in the corporate and securities litigation arena, with the U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:45 pm
There, a derivative complaint was brought against three directors of a Delaware corporation who approved transactions challenged in the litigation. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 11:21 am
Further, this type of broad bar would prohibit any shareholder, and even EZCORP itself, from litigating against the directors, regardless of what evidence may be discovered in the future. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
For instance, after suffering a cyber-attack, a corporation must not only bear the substantial regulatory and litigation costs associated with potential privacy violations – that is just the tip of the iceberg. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 4:04 am
However, the Supreme Court’s decision in In re Walt Disney Co. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm
Delaware Passes Law Banning Fee-Shifting Bylaws: The Delaware legislature overwhelmingly passed S.B. 75, which prohibits Delaware stock corporations from adopting “loser pays” fee-shifting bylaws and which confirms that Delaware corporations may adopt bylaws designating Delaware courts as the exclusive forum for shareholder litigation. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
Is there an accurate and current network topology diagram that is adequately documented, and if so, is it periodically re-assessed and revised as internal systems and external factors change? [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
The plaintiffs in Stevens are former minority shareholders of a corporation. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 1:36 pm
Judge McGuire calculated it at a staggering $941.72 per hour (Order ¶35), which was triple the hourly fee the Business Court had approved in a previous class action (In re Harris Teeter Merger Litig., 2014 NCBC 44) and seven times the hourly fee awarded in another class action approval (In re Progress Energy Shareholder Litig., 2011 NCBC 44). [read post]
