Search for: "In re Answers Corporation Shareholders Litigation"
Results 101 - 120
of 299
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2018, 3:18 am
At a non-jury trial — Can you believe, litigating all the way through trial over $21,000? [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:02 pm
Travis, the sole shareholder of The Travis Law Firm, met with William D. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:29 pm
To get to that answer (and to leave the door open of such liability for corporations) the majority (and plurality) asks and answers two questions: The Court must first ask whether the law of nations imposes liability on corporations for human-rights violations committed by its employees. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
”[9] Maintaining this balance is especially important because it is shareholders who “ultimately bear the burden” of meritless litigation.[10] Congress Passes the Reform Act By the 1990s, private securities litigation had gotten out of control. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
The insurers argued on their motion to dismiss that the plaintiff was not covered by the FLSA because he had entered into independent contractor agreements with the insurers in the name of his corporation, Chris Ferguson Insurance Services, Inc., for whom he was the sole shareholder and president. [read post]
Rare Partnership Dissolution Decision Applies Deadlock Standard to Dissolution Under Partnership Law
22 Jan 2018, 3:44 am
The short answer is yes. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 3:05 pm
You may think you do, but the legal answer to this question might surprise you. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:24 am
” If something strikes you amiss, at least as to the provision’s first clause concerning stock valuation, you’re not alone. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 12:00 am
In In re Medtronic Inc., Shareholder Litigation., 2016 WL 6066253 (Minn. 2017), the Supreme Court of Minnesota affirmed in part, and reversed in part Kenneth Steiner’s (“Respondent”) claims asserted in a class-action challenge to Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:31 am
Obviously I can’t answer that question as it pertains to Lund or any other case in which I’ve had no involvement. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:31 am
Obviously I can’t answer that question as it pertains to Lund or any other case in which I’ve had no involvement. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 8:39 am
The answer was the growth of societal structures (markets) providing extra legal enforcement--a lex mercatoria for sovereign debt? [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 3:14 am
The article uses social science and expansive notions of contractual relations in advocating for courts to give greater weight to what he calls “family values” in adjudicating corporate dissolution and other disputes among shareholder-members of the same family. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 4:02 am
Enforcement had not sought a re-application requirement to follow the period of suspension. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:12 am
And when you have corporations that have hugely vested interests in maintaining high incarceration rates in order to serve their shareholders—and these are publicly traded organizations, they're bought and sold on the stock market—that creates a perverse incentive. [read post]
21 May 2016, 2:34 pm
Our firm has also handled many shareholder and LLC disputes between owners of closely held corporations, and LLCs. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm
The answer at this stage is unclear, as these manuscript products are largely untested in the courts. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 6:26 am
That’s unfortunate, because the Google shareholders (including Google shareholders in Mississippi) could well have benefited from some of the answers that General Hood was trying to extract from Google about Google’s failures to comply with the NPA. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 10:37 am
In ATP Tour, the high court answered questions of law certified to it from the U.S. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 10:37 am
In ATP Tour, the high court answered questions of law certified to it from the U.S. [read post]
